Literature DB >> 17249449

Follow-up abdominal CT is not necessary in low-grade splenic injury.

James M Haan1, Sharon Boswell, Deborah Stein, Thomas M Scalea.   

Abstract

Nonoperative management of splenic injury has become the standard of care in the hemodynamically stable patient. The time period of observation and the utility of follow-up scanning remain an area of debate. This study examined the utility of follow-up abdominal CT for detection of delayed vascular injury in patients with low-grade splenic injury. A retrospective review of all patients with low-grade splenic injuries undergoing nonoperative management from June 2000 to June 2004 was performed. Patients underwent follow-up abdominal CT 48 to 72 hours after admission to rule out delayed vascular injury and were discharged if the results were negative. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, abdominal CT results, and splenic salvage. A total of 472 patients underwent nonoperative management for splenic injury, with 140 patients treated with simple observation during this protocol. All patients were successfully managed with simple observation with no nonoperative failures; there were two instances of delayed vascular injury on follow-up CT. Both patients with progression of injury had decreasing hematocrit levels during admission prior to follow-up abdominal CT scan. Overall, the injury severity score was 22 points and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) splenic injury severity score was 1.8 points. Length of hospital stay was 2.8 days for patients with predominately splenic injury and 10 days for the overall cohort. Follow-up abdominal CT confers no benefit in patients with low-grade splenic injury, and a stable hematocrit level and abdominal exam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17249449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of need for operative intervention in blunt splenic injury: intraperitoneal contrast extravasation has an increased probability of requiring operative intervention.

Authors:  Chih-Yuan Fu; Shih-Chi Wu; Ray-Jade Chen; Yung-Fang Chen; Yu-Chun Wang; Hung-Chang Huang; Jui-Chien Huang; Chih-Wei Lu; Wei-Ching Lin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  [Treatment practice in patients with isolated blunt splenic injuries. A survey of Swiss traumatologists].

Authors:  B Schnüriger; F Martens; B M Eberle; P Renzulli; C A Seiler; D Candinas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Comparison of MDCT protocols in trauma patients with suspected splenic injury: superior results with protocol that includes arterial and portal venous phase imaging.

Authors:  Raymond Melikian; Stephanie Goldberg; Brian James Strife; Robert A Halvorsen
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Twenty years of splenic preservation in trauma: lower early infection rate than in splenectomy.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Gauer; Susanne Gerber-Paulet; Christian Seiler; Walter Paul Schweizer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Literature review of the role of ultrasound, computed tomography, and transcatheter arterial embolization for the treatment of traumatic splenic injuries.

Authors:  Cornelis H van der Vlies; Otto M van Delden; Bastiaan J Punt; Kees J Ponsen; Jim A Reekers; J Carel Goslings
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  The song remains the same although the instruments are changing: complications following selective non-operative management of blunt spleen trauma: a retrospective review of patients at a level I trauma centre from 1996 to 2007.

Authors:  Aisling A Clancy; Corina Tiruta; Dianne Ashman; Chad G Ball; Andrew W Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2012-03-13

7.  The investigation of posttraumatic pseudoaneurysms in patients treated with nonoperative management for blunt abdominal solid organ injuries.

Authors:  Hirotada Kittaka; Yoshiki Yagi; Ryosuke Zushi; Hiroshi Hazui; Hiroshi Akimoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Giulia Montori; Fausto Catena; Yoram Kluger; Walter Biffl; Ernest E Moore; Viktor Reva; Camilla Bing; Miklosh Bala; Paola Fugazzola; Hany Bahouth; Ingo Marzi; George Velmahos; Rao Ivatury; Kjetil Soreide; Tal Horer; Richard Ten Broek; Bruno M Pereira; Gustavo P Fraga; Kenji Inaba; Joseph Kashuk; Neil Parry; Peter T Masiakos; Konstantinos S Mylonas; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Simone Vasilij Benatti; Noel Naidoo; Francesco Salvetti; Stefano Maccatrozzo; Vanni Agnoletti; Emiliano Gamberini; Leonardo Solaini; Antonio Costanzo; Andrea Celotti; Matteo Tomasoni; Vladimir Khokha; Catherine Arvieux; Lena Napolitano; Lauri Handolin; Michele Pisano; Stefano Magnone; David A Spain; Marc de Moya; Kimberly A Davis; Nicola De Angelis; Ari Leppaniemi; Paula Ferrada; Rifat Latifi; David Costa Navarro; Yashuiro Otomo; Raul Coimbra; Ronald V Maier; Frederick Moore; Sandro Rizoli; Boris Sakakushev; Joseph M Galante; Osvaldo Chiara; Stefania Cimbanassi; Alain Chichom Mefire; Dieter Weber; Marco Ceresoli; Andrew B Peitzman; Liban Wehlie; Massimo Sartelli; Salomone Di Saverio; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  MAIN CONTROVERSIES IN THE NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT SPLENIC INJURIES.

Authors:  Jorge Roberto Marcante Carlotto; Gaspar de Jesus Lopes-Filho; Ramiro Colleoni-Neto
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2016-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.