Literature DB >> 17249225

Massive and distinctive effects of meadow voles on grassland vegetation.

Henry F Howe1, Barbara Zorn-Arnold, Amy Sullivan, Joel S Brown.   

Abstract

We ask whether vole herbivory in experimental grassland plots is sufficient to create an unpalatable community. In a six-year experiment, meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) reduced plant standing crop between 30% and 72%, well within the range of ungulate effects. Moreover, meadow voles reduced their available forage species by changing the plant community composition: four grass species and a legume upon which they foraged declined sharply in cover and/or number of individuals, five forbs avoided by voles increased, and two forbs neither declined nor increased with either measure. Reductions of diversity occurred when voles first defoliated the plots in 2000 but disappeared as plant species avoided by voles replaced vulnerable plants. Within six years, meadow voles created plant communities dominated by species that they did not eat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17249225     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[3007:madeom]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  13 in total

1.  Varying impacts of cervid, hare and vole browsing on growth and survival of boreal tree seedlings.

Authors:  Mari Lyly; Tero Klemola; Elina Koivisto; Otso Huitu; Lauri Oksanen; Erkki Korpimäki
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Rodent suppression of seedling establishment in tropical pasture.

Authors:  Crystal A Guzmán; Henry F Howe; David H Wise; Rosamond I Coates; Jenny Zambrano
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Response of two prairie forbs to repeated vole herbivory.

Authors:  Amy T Sullivan; Henry F Howe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Microsite affects willow sapling recovery from bank vole (Myodes glareolus) herbivory, but does not affect grazing risk.

Authors:  Rosalind F Shaw; Robin J Pakeman; Mark R Young; Glenn R Iason
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Interactions of herbivore exclusion with warming and N addition in a grass-dominated temperate old field.

Authors:  Eric R D Moise; Hugh A L Henry
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Reversal of fortune: plant suppression and recovery after vole herbivory.

Authors:  Henry F Howe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Functional identity versus species richness: herbivory resistance in plant communities.

Authors:  Christoph Scherber; Juliane Heimann; Günter Köhler; Nadine Mitschunas; Wolfgang W Weisser
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  An Experimental Test of Competition among Mice, Chipmunks, and Squirrels in Deciduous Forest Fragments.

Authors:  Jesse L Brunner; Shannon Duerr; Felicia Keesing; Mary Killilea; Holly Vuong; Richard S Ostfeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Diversity protects plant communities against generalist molluscan herbivores.

Authors:  Yvonne Fabian; Nadine Sandau; Odile T Bruggisser; Patrik Kehrli; Alexandre Aebi; Rudolf P Rohr; Russell E Naisbit; Louis-Félix Bersier
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Influence of global atmospheric change on the feeding behavior and growth performance of a mammalian herbivore, Microtus ochrogaster.

Authors:  Christopher W Habeck; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.