Literature DB >> 17249006

An experimental comparison of selection alternatives to plateaued response.

W P Brown1, A E Bell.   

Abstract

Three alternative selection methods for extending selection limits or breaking response plateaus were compared over ten generations in a replicated model experiment using two unrelated populations of Drosophila melanogaster that no longer responded to purebred selection for high egg number, a heterotic polygenic trait. The three methods were: (1) reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS) with selection within each of the plateaued populations based solely on crossbred performance, (2) a modification of reciprocal recurrent selection (MRRS) with selection within each population based on both purebred and crossbred performance, and (3) purebred selection within a new synthetic population formed by crossing the two plateaued populations.--Conflicting estimates were obtained for heritability of purebred egg number in each of the plateaued populations. The realized heritability values and estimates from diallel analyses indicated an absence of additive genetic variation for both populations; however, estimates from conventional intraclass correlation methods were positive. The diallel analyses revealed significant amounts of nonadditive gene effects for purebred egg number in each population, while the significant gene effects for crossbred egg numbers were additive. Estimates of the genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred egg number were negative (-0.85 +/- 0.68 and -0.32 +/- 0.25) for the two base populations.--All three alternatives to continued purebred selection gave significant responses, with the average gain per generation from MRRS being significantly superior to the other two methods. Observed purebred and crossbred responses under RRS were in agreement with quantitative genetic theory. Such was not the case for MRRS, which suggested the possibility of major gene segregation.--Evidence supporting a negative genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance and the possibility of overdominance is presented and discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1980        PMID: 17249006      PMCID: PMC1214153     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  6 in total

1.  The evaluation of new methods for the improvement of quantitative characteristics.

Authors:  A E BELL; C H MOORE; D C WARREN
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1955

2.  Genetic Analysis of a "Plateaued" Population of Drosophila Melanogaster.

Authors:  W P Brown; A E Bell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A Comparison of Purebred and Crossbred Selection Schemes with Two Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.

Authors:  K Kojima; T M Kelleher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The nature of the purebred-crossbred genetic covariance.

Authors:  R W McNew; A E Bell
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Selection for a threshold character in Drosophila. 3. Genetic control of variability in plateaued populations.

Authors:  B D Latter
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Reciprocal Recurrent Selection Compared to within-Strain Selection for Increasing Rate of Egg Lay of Tribolium under Optimal and Stress Conditions.

Authors:  F Orozco; A E Bell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 4.562

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Selection for fertility in mice - the selection plateau and how to overcome it.

Authors:  L Schüler
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Non-additive gene effects in populations under different methods of selection.

Authors:  E A Carbonell; A E Bell; J J Frey
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.699

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.