Literature DB >> 17248877

Effects of marker chromosomes on relative viability.

C C Cockerham1, T Mukai.   

Abstract

Viability relative to Cy/Pm as a standard was studied in Drosophila melanogaster. One experiment, E1, consisted of progeny from eleven distinct 7 x 7 factorial mating designs with reciprocals for second chromosomes extracted from a natural population. The other experiment, E2, consisted of two distinct sets of heterozygotes with reciprocals and corresponding homozygotes. It was established from E1 that there are little to no synergistic effects among different genotypes in a vial and that Cy and Pm heterozygotes vary almost as much as would be expected if one chromosome were held constant for wild-type heterozygotes. In wild-type heterozygotes, variances were estimated to be 0.0099 for average chromosomal effects, 0.0054 for interactions of chromosomes, 0.0021 for maternal effects, 0.0079 for paternal effects, and -0.0010 for the remaining interaction effects, all being significantly different from zero except the last. The variances of Cy and Pm heterozygotes, covariance of Cy and Pm heterozygotes, and covariances of Cy and Pm heterozygotes with wild-type heterozygotes, as well as the comparable statistics available in E2, all showed a large paternal component of variance and a smaller maternal component of variance, both unexpected results.-From E2 the variance of homozygotes, excluding error variance, was estimated to be 0.0149, and the covariances of homozygotes with wild-type heterozygotes to be 0.0056 for maternally derived chromosomes common and 0.0126 for paternally derived chromosomes common, again showing the larger paternal than maternal influence. The average genetic regression of heterozygotes on homozygotes of 0.61 was reduced only slightly to 0.56 by correcting for maternal and paternal variances. These genetic regressions, generally utilized as estimators of the average degree of dominance, are larger than any previously reported.-Differential meiotic drive in Cy and Pm parents was shown to be compatible with the large paternal and maternal variances, but other causes cannot be ruled out.-Approximations were developed for translating various variances, covariances, and regressions between single- and double-marker experiments, assuming that marker chromosomes behave as typical wild-type chromosomes in one case and assuming a (partially) recessive model with the population in mutation selection balance in another case. Various features, particularly the estimation of dominance, were compared and discussed between the two cases.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID: 17248877      PMCID: PMC1213922     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  15 in total

1.  Formation of cytoplasmic synaptonemal-like polycomplexes at leptotene and normal synaptonemal complexes at zygotene in Ascaris suum Male Meiosis.

Authors:  Y F Bodganov
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1977-04-27       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 2.  The cytogenetics of Neurospora.

Authors:  D D Perkins; E G Barry
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.944

3.  Studies of the binding of adenine to adenine phosphoribosyltransferase.

Authors:  R E Gadd; J F Henderson
Journal:  Can J Biochem       Date:  1970-03

4.  Meiosis in Schizophyllum commune. Chromosomal behavior and the synaptinemal complex.

Authors:  M Radu; R Steinlauf; Y Koltin
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1974-07-22       Impact factor: 2.552

5.  A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy.

Authors:  A R Spurr
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1969-01

6.  Fine structure of chromosome pairing in ten Ascomycetes: meiotic and premeiotic (mitotic) synaptonemal complexes.

Authors:  D Zickler
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Reconstruction of the Neurospora crassa pachytene karyotype from serial sections of synaptonemal complexes.

Authors:  C B Gillies
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Estimation of Fitness Components in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER . I. Heterozygote Viability Indices.

Authors:  A J Katz; R A Cardellino
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A fine structure analysis of meiotic pairing in Chlamydomonas reinhardi.

Authors:  R Storms; P J Hastings
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 3.905

10.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XI. Genetic variability in a local population.

Authors:  T Mukai; O Yamaguchi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  5 in total

1.  On the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Xiv. Effects of the Incomplete Dominance of the IN(2LR)SM1 (Cy) Chromosome on the Estimates of Various Genetic Parameters.

Authors:  T Mukai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Causes and consequences of variation in energy storage in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XXIV. Effects of hybrid dysgenesis on the components of genetic variance of variability.

Authors:  D S Suh; T Mukai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Natural selection with nuclear and cytoplasmic transmission. II. Tests with Drosophila from diverse populations.

Authors:  A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.562

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.