Literature DB >> 17248819

Single-trait and antagonistic index selection for litter size and body weight in mice.

E J Eisen1.   

Abstract

INDIVIDUAL SELECTION BASED ON FEMALE PERFORMANCE ONLY WAS CONDUCTED IN FOUR LINES OF MICE: L(+) for increased litter size, W(+) for increased 6-week body weight, L(-)W(+) for a selection index aimed at decreasing litter size and increasing 6-week body weight and L(+)W(-) for a selection index aimed at increasing litter size and decreasing 6-week body weight. A fifth line (K) served as an unselected control. All litters were standardized to eight mice at one day of age. Expected heritability was based on twice the regression of offspring on dam (h(2) (d)), which contains additive genetic variance due to direct (sigma(2) (A(o) )) and maternal (sigma(2) (A(m) )) effects and their covariance (sigma(A(o)A(m) )). Responses and correlated responses were measured either deviated (method 1) or not deviated (method 2) from the control line. Realized heritabilities (h(2) (R)) for litter size were 0.19 +/- 0.04 (1) and 0.16 +/- 0.03 (2), which were similar to h( 2) (d) of 0.17 +/- 0.04. The h(2) ( R) for 6-week body weight of 0.55 +/- 0.07 (1) and 0.44 +/- 0.07 (2) agreed with h(2) (d) of 0.42 +/- 0.02. Realized genetic correlations (r*(G(R) )) between litter size and 6-week body weight calculated from the double-selection experiment were 0.52 +/- 0.10 (1) and 0.52 +/- 0.13 (2), which were not significantly different from the base population estimate of r*( G(d) ) = 0.63 +/- 0.14. Divergence (L(-)W( +) minus L(+)W(-)) in the antagonistic index selection lines was 0.21 +/- 0.01 index units (I = 0.305 P(W) - 0.436 P(L), where P( W) and P(L) are the phenotypic values for 6-week body weight and litter size, respectively.). The h(2) ( R) of index units of 0.14 +/- 0.02 calculated from divergence agreed with h(2) (d) of 0.14 +/- 0.04. Divergences in litter size (-0.19 +/- 0.07) and 6-week body weight (0.46 +/- 0.10) were in the expected direction. Antagonistic index selection yielded about one-half the expected divergence in litter size, while divergence in 6-week body weight was only slightly less than expected. Realized genetic correlations indicated that litter size, 6-week body weight and index units each showed positive pleiotropy with 3-week body weight, postweaning gain and weight at vaginal introitus and negative pleiotropy with age at vaginal introitus. Sex ratio and several components of fitness (days from joining to parturition, percent fertile matings and percent perinatal survival) did not change significantly in the selected lines.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID: 17248819      PMCID: PMC1275570     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  14 in total

1.  Patterns of response in selection experiments with mice.

Authors:  D S FALCONER
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1955

2.  Realized genetic parameters from index selection in mice.

Authors:  P J Berger; W R Harvey
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Genetic Correlation between Growth Rate and Litter Size in Mice.

Authors:  G W Rahnefeld; R E Comstock; M Singh; S R Napuket
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Selection in small populations of chickens.

Authors:  A W Nordskog; H S Tolman; D W Casey; C Y Lin
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  A comparison of multiple trait selection methods in the mouse.

Authors:  D P Doolittle; S P Wilson; L L Hulbert
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1972 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

6.  Design and efficiency of selection experiments for estimating genetic parameters.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The effect of sire on litter size in mice.

Authors:  P Schilling; W North; R Bogart
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1968 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  Genetic differences in age and weight at sexual maturation in female mice selected for rapid growth rate.

Authors:  H Bakker; J Nagai; E J Eisen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Genetic analysis of a strain of mice plateaued for litter size.

Authors:  J Eklund; G E Bradford
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Ovulation and post-ovulational losses in strains of mice selected from large and small litters.

Authors:  N Bateman
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  10 in total

1.  Genetic interpretation and analysis of diallel crosses with animals.

Authors:  E J Eisen; G Hörstgen-Schwark; A M Saxton; T R Bandy
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Selection for fertility in mice - the selection plateau and how to overcome it.

Authors:  L Schüler
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Influence of early pregnancy on reproductive rate in lines of mice selected for litter size.

Authors:  E J Eisen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Selection response for litter size at birth and litter weight at weaning in the first parity in mice.

Authors:  B G Luxford; R G Beilharz
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Genetic analysis in the Collaborative Cross breeding population.

Authors:  Vivek M Philip; Greta Sokoloff; Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell; Martin Striz; Lisa Branstetter; Melissa A Beckmann; Jason S Spence; Barbara L Jackson; Leslie D Galloway; Paul Barker; Ann M Wymore; Patricia R Hunsicker; David C Durtschi; Ginger S Shaw; Sarah Shinpock; Kenneth F Manly; Darla R Miller; Kevin D Donohue; Cymbeline T Culiat; Gary A Churchill; William R Lariviere; Abraham A Palmer; Bruce F O'Hara; Brynn H Voy; Elissa J Chesler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Altering developmental trajectories in mice by restricted index selection.

Authors:  W R Atchley; S Xu; D E Cowley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Relationships between quantitative and reproductive fitness traits in animals.

Authors:  Lutz Bünger; Ronald M Lewis; Max F Rothschild; Agustin Blasco; Ulla Renne; Geoff Simm
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Growth quantitative trait loci (QTL) on mouse chromosome 10 in a Quackenbush-Swiss x C57BL/6J backcross.

Authors:  A C Collins; I C Martin; B W Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Turning Observed Founder Alleles into Expected Relationships in an Intercross Population.

Authors:  Jilun Meng; Manfred Mayer; Erika Wytrwat; Martina Langhammer; Norbert Reinsch
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Experimental Evidence for Adaptation to Species-Specific Gut Microbiota in House Mice.

Authors:  Andrew H Moeller; João C Gomes-Neto; Sara Mantz; Hatem Kittana; Rafael R Segura Munoz; Robert J Schmaltz; Amanda E Ramer-Tait; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.389

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.