Literature DB >> 17246484

Design and analysis of experiments on random drift and inbreeding depression.

M Lynch1.   

Abstract

While the genetic consequences of inbreeding and small population size are of fundamental importance in many areas of biology, empirical research on these phenomena has proceeded in the absence of a well-developed statistical methodology. The usual approach is to compare observed means and variances with the expectations of Wright's neutral, additive genetic model for quantitative characters. If the observations deviate from the expectations more than can be accounted for by sampling variance of the parameter estimates, the null hypothesis is routinely rejected in favor of alternatives invoking evolutionary forces such as selection or nonadditive gene action. This is a biased procedure because it treats sequential samples from the same populations as independent, and because it ignores the fact that the expectations of the neutral additive genetic model will rarely be realized when only a finite number of lines are studied. Even when genes are perfectly additive and neutral, the variation among the properties of founder populations, the random development of linkage disequilibrium within lines, and the variance in inbreeding between lines reduce the likelihood that Wright's expectations will be realized in any particular set of lines. Under most experimental designs, these sources of variation are much too large to be ignored. Formulas are presented for the variance-covariance structure of the realized within- and between-line variance under the neutral additive genetic model. These results are then used to develop statistical tests for detecting the operation of selection and/or inbreeding depression in small populations. A number of recommendations are made for the optimal design of experiments on drift and inbreeding, and a method is suggested for the correction of data for general environmental effects. In general, it appears that we can best understand the response of populations to inbreeding and finite population size by studying a very large number (>100) of self-fertilizing or full-sib mated lines in parallel with one or more stable control populations.

Entities:  

Year:  1988        PMID: 17246484      PMCID: PMC1203557     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  15 in total

1.  The effect of selection on genetic variability: a simulation study.

Authors:  M G Bulmer
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Variance in quantitative traits due to linked dominant genes and variance in heterozygosity in small populations.

Authors:  P J Avery; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Variability in genetic parameters among small populations.

Authors:  P J Avery; W G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  The rate of polygenic mutation.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Estimation of response to selection and utilization of control populations for additional information and accuracy.

Authors:  W M Muir
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Genetic drift and inbreeding depression measured from control populations of mice.

Authors:  E J Eisen; J P Hanrahan
Journal:  Can J Genet Cytol       Date:  1974-03

7.  Estimation of realised heritabilities from selection experiments. I. Divergent selection.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Estimation of realised heritabilities from selection experiments. II. Selection in one direction.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  The theory of speciation via the founder principle.

Authors:  A R Templeton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Variance of actual inbreeding.

Authors:  C C Cockerham; B S Weir
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.570

View more
  24 in total

1.  The changes in genetic and environmental variance with inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M C Whitlock; K Fowler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P C Phillips; M C Whitlock; K Fowler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Nonequivalent Loci and the distribution of mutant effects.

Authors:  J J Welch; D Waxman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Recent approaches into the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in plants.

Authors:  David E Carr; Michele R Dudash
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Metabolic control analysis as a mechanism that conserves genetic variance during advanced cycle breeding.

Authors:  J Yu; R Bernardo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Epistasis in monkeyflowers.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Effects of self-fertilization, environmental stress and exposure to xenobiotics on fitness-related traits of the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis.

Authors:  Marie-Agnès Coutellec; Laurent Lagadic
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Variance of neutral genetic variances within and between populations for a quantitative character.

Authors:  Z B Zeng; C C Cockerham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Population bottlenecks increase additive genetic variance but do not break a selection limit in rain forest Drosophila.

Authors:  Belinda van Heerwaarden; Yvonne Willi; Torsten N Kristensen; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Inbreeding depression and dominance-suppression competition after inbreeding in rapeseed (Brassica napus).

Authors:  C Damgaard; V Loeschcke
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.