Literature DB >> 17244516

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract reduces bacterial bloodstream infection and mortality in critically ill patients. Systematic review of randomized, controlled trials.

L Silvestri1, H K F van Saene, M Milanese, D Gregori, A Gullo.   

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) was undertaken to evaluate the impact of this procedure on bacterial bloodstream infection and mortality. Data sources were Medline, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, previous meta-analyses, and conference proceedings, without restriction of language or publication status. RCTs were retrieved that compared oropharyngeal and/or intestinal administration of antibiotics as part of the SDD protocol, with or without a parenteral component, with no treatment or placebo in the controls. The three outcome measures were patients with bloodstream infection, causative micro-organisms, and total mortality. Fifty-one RCTs conducted between 1987 and 2005, comprising 8065 critically ill patients were included in the review; 4079 patients received SDD and 3986 were controls. SDD significantly reduced overall bloodstream infections [odds ratio (OR), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-0.90; P=0.0036], gram-negative bloodstream infections (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24-0.63; P<0.001) and overall mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94; P=0.0064), without affecting gram-positive bloodstream infections (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.47). The subgroup analysis showed an even larger impact of SDD using parenteral and enteral antimicrobials on overall bloodstream infections, bloodstream infections due to gram-negative bacteria and overall mortality with ORs of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.46-0.87; P=0.005), 0.30 (95% CI, 0.16-0.56; P<0.001), and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.61-0.91; P=0.0034), respectively. Twenty patients need to be treated with SDD to prevent one gram-negative bloodstream infection and 22 patients to prevent one death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17244516     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  53 in total

1.  Current status on VAP prevention: evidence-based medicine makes the ethics of withholding SDD questionable.

Authors:  L Silvestri; H K F van Saene; S Tomasino; N Taylor
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  SDD, SOD, or oropharyngeal chlorhexidine to prevent pneumonia and to reduce mortality in ventilated patients: which manoeuvre is evidence-based?

Authors:  Luciano Silvestri; Hendrick K F van Saene; Durk F Zandstra; Marino Viviani; Dario Gregori
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  ICU-acquired candidemia within SDD: low incidence in a 20-year longitudinal database.

Authors:  Sophie H Buitinck; Durk F Zandstra; Peter H J van der Voort
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Perioperative selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) in elective colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Daphne Roos; Lea M Dijksman; Brigitte M Sondermeijer; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten; Laurens T de Wit; Michael F Gerhards
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The Japanese guidelines for the management of sepsis.

Authors:  Shigeto Oda; Mayuki Aibiki; Toshiaki Ikeda; Hitoshi Imaizumi; Shigeatsu Endo; Ryoichi Ochiai; Joji Kotani; Nobuaki Shime; Osamu Nishida; Takayuki Noguchi; Naoyuki Matsuda; Hiroyuki Hirasawa
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 6.  Management and prevention of drug resistant infections in burn patients.

Authors:  Roohi Vinaik; Dalia Barayan; Shahriar Shahrokhi; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  The pros, cons, and unknowns of search and destroy for carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Prashini Moodley; Andrew Whitelaw
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.725

8.  Enteral vancomycin and probiotic use for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus antibiotic-associated diarrhoea.

Authors:  Elizabeth Nicole Sizemore; Kenya Maria Rivas; Jose Valdes; Joshua Caballero
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-07-27

Review 9.  Prophylactic antibiotics for burns patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tomer Avni; Ariela Levcovich; Dean D Ad-El; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-02-15

10.  Prevention, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of sepsis: 1st revision of S-2k guidelines of the German Sepsis Society (Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V. (DSG)) and the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI)).

Authors:  K Reinhart; F M Brunkhorst; H-G Bone; J Bardutzky; C-E Dempfle; H Forst; P Gastmeier; H Gerlach; M Gründling; S John; W Kern; G Kreymann; W Krüger; P Kujath; G Marggraf; J Martin; K Mayer; A Meier-Hellmann; M Oppert; C Putensen; M Quintel; M Ragaller; R Rossaint; H Seifert; C Spies; F Stüber; N Weiler; A Weimann; K Werdan; T Welte
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.