Literature DB >> 17244301

The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.

Mark Emms1, Christopher J Tredwin, Derrick J Setchell, David R Moles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Factors affecting the retention of fixed prostheses to natural abutments are well understood. In contrast, little is known concerning factors influencing the retention of fixed prostheses cemented to implant abutments. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect that varying implant abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method has on the retention of castings cemented to implant abutments using TempBond.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four 15 degrees preangled abutments (Nobel Biocare Replace Select Esthetic) of each platform size--narrow (NP), regular (RP), and wide (WP)--were used. In each group of abutments the screw access axial wall was either unadjusted, one-third removed, two-thirds removed, or completely removed. The screw access channels were either fully or partially filled with Memosil, a vinyl polysiloxane impression material. For each abutment a casting was constructed that incorporated an attachment to allow removal. Castings were cemented to abutments with TempBond. The tensile force required to separate the cemented castings from the abutments was measured using an Instron Universal load-testing machine.
RESULTS: The mean peak removal force for comparable abutments was significantly different ( p < 0.05): (1) where the screw access channel was completely filled with Memosil compared with those partially filled with Memosil; (2) with platform sizes--WP > RP > NP; (3) with alteration of axial wall height--1/3 removed > unadjusted = 2/3 removed > total wall removal.
CONCLUSIONS: The retention of castings cemented to implant abutments with TempBond is influenced by the wall height, platform size, and the filling modality of the screw access channel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17244301     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00150.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  12 in total

1.  Effect of Abutment Height on Retention of Single Cement-retained, Wide- and Narrow-platform Implant-supported Restorations.

Authors:  Fariba Saleh Saber; Nader Abolfazli; Sara Nuroloyuni; Sohleh Khodabakhsh; Mehran Bahrami; Reza Nahidi; Somaieh Zeighami
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2012-09-01

2.  Evaluation of the Effect of Axial Wall Modification and Coping Design on the Retention of Cement-retained Implant-supported Crowns.

Authors:  Reza Derafshi; Ahmad Hasan Ahangari; Kianoosh Torabi; Mitra Farzin
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-03-04

3.  Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.

Authors:  Mitra Farzin; Kianoosh Torabi; Ahmad Hasan Ahangari; Reza Derafshi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-05-31

4.  Effect of Surface Modifications on the Retention of Cement-retained Implant Crowns under Fatigue Loads: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  R Ajay; K Suma; Seyed Asharaf Ali; Jambai Sampath Kumar Sivakumar; V Rakshagan; V Devaki; K Divya
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2017-11

Review 5.  Retention failures in cement- and screw-retained fixed restorations on dental implants in partially edentulous arches: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jatin K Jain; Rajesh Sethuraman; Sameer Chauhan; Piyush Javiya; Shreya Srivastava; Rutvik Patel; Bhagyashri Bhalani
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

6.  Full Arch All-on-4 Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses with 8.5 Years of Follow-Up: A Case Report.

Authors:  Hakimeh Siadat; Amirreza Rokn; Elaheh Beyabanaki
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2018-07

7.  Monolithic and Minimally Veneered Zirconia Complications as Implant-Supported Restorative Material: A Retrospective Clinical Study up to 5 Years.

Authors:  Markel Diéguez-Pereira; David Chávarri-Prado; Alejandro Estrada-Martínez; Esteban Pérez-Pevida; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The effect of resin cements and primer on retentive force of zirconia copings bonded to zirconia abutments with insufficient retention.

Authors:  Seung-Mi Kim; Ji-Young Yoon; Myung-Hyun Lee; Nam-Sik Oh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Effect of surface treatments on the retention of implant-supported cement-retained bridge with short abutments: An in vitro comparative evaluation.

Authors:  Monica Shrivastav
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

10.  In Vitro Impact Testing to Simulate Implant-Supported Prosthesis Retrievability in Clinical Practice: Influence of Cement and Abutment Geometry.

Authors:  Andrea T Lugas; Mara Terzini; Elisabetta M Zanetti; Gianmario Schierano; Carlo Manzella; Domenico Baldi; Cristina Bignardi; Alberto L Audenino
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.