BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the extent to which language skills are part of general intelligence and even more uncertainty on whether deprivation has differential effects on language and non-language skills. METHODS: Language and cognitive outcomes at 6 and 11 years of age were compared between a sample of 132 institution-reared Romanian children adopted into UK families under the age of 42 months, and a sample of 49 children adopted within the UK under the age of 6 months who had not experienced either institutional rearing or profound deprivation. RESULTS: The effects of institutional deprivation were basically similar for language and cognitive outcomes at age 6; in both there were few negative effects of deprivation if it ended before the age of 6 months and there was no linear association with duration of deprivation within the 6 to 42 month range. For the children over 18 months on arrival (range 18-42 months), the presence of even very minimal language skills (imitation of speech sounds) at the time of arrival was a strong beneficial prognostic factor for language and cognitive outcomes, but not for social/emotional/behavioural outcomes. Individual variations in adoptive parent characteristics were unrelated to differences in language or cognitive outcomes, possibly as a consequence of the limited variability in the adoptive family group. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal language probably indexes some form of cognitive reserve that, in turn, indexes the degree of institutional deprivation.
BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the extent to which language skills are part of general intelligence and even more uncertainty on whether deprivation has differential effects on language and non-language skills. METHODS: Language and cognitive outcomes at 6 and 11 years of age were compared between a sample of 132 institution-reared Romanian children adopted into UK families under the age of 42 months, and a sample of 49 children adopted within the UK under the age of 6 months who had not experienced either institutional rearing or profound deprivation. RESULTS: The effects of institutional deprivation were basically similar for language and cognitive outcomes at age 6; in both there were few negative effects of deprivation if it ended before the age of 6 months and there was no linear association with duration of deprivation within the 6 to 42 month range. For the children over 18 months on arrival (range 18-42 months), the presence of even very minimal language skills (imitation of speech sounds) at the time of arrival was a strong beneficial prognostic factor for language and cognitive outcomes, but not for social/emotional/behavioural outcomes. Individual variations in adoptive parent characteristics were unrelated to differences in language or cognitive outcomes, possibly as a consequence of the limited variability in the adoptive family group. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal language probably indexes some form of cognitive reserve that, in turn, indexes the degree of institutional deprivation.
Authors: Seth D Pollak; Charles A Nelson; Mary F Schlaak; Barbara J Roeber; Sandi S Wewerka; Kristen L Wiik; Kristin A Frenn; Michelle M Loman; Megan R Gunnar Journal: Child Dev Date: 2010 Jan-Feb
Authors: Jennifer Windsor; Joann P Benigno; Christine A Wing; Patrick J Carroll; Sebastian F Koga; Charles A Nelson; Nathan A Fox; Charles H Zeanah Journal: Child Dev Date: 2011-06-16
Authors: Robert B McCall; Christina J Groark; Brandi N Hawk; Megan M Julian; Emily C Merz; Johana M Rosas; Rifkat J Muhamedrahimov; Oleg I Palmov; Natasha V Nikiforova Journal: Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev Date: 2019-06
Authors: Catherine Stamoulis; Ross E Vanderwert; Charles H Zeanah; Nathan A Fox; Charles A Nelson Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 2.714