Literature DB >> 17243474

Comparative susceptibility of indigenous and improved pig breeds to Classical swine fever virus infection: practical and epidemiological implications in a subsistence-based, developing country setting.

S D Blacksell1, S Khounsy, D Van Aken, L J Gleeson, H A Westbury.   

Abstract

This study investigated the comparative susceptibility of indigenous Moo Laat and improved Large White/Landrace pig breeds to infection with classical swine fever virus (CSFV) under controlled conditions in the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR). The Moo Laat (ML) and Large White/Landrace cross-breed (LWC) pigs were inoculated with a standard challenge strain designated Lao/Kham225 (infectivity titre of 10(2.75) TCID50/ml). The results demonstrated that both the native breed and an improved pig breed are fully susceptible to CSFV infection and the mortality rate is high. LWC pigs demonstrated lower (or shorter) survival times (50% survival time: 11 days), earlier and higher pyrexia and earlier onset of viraemia compared to ML pigs (50% survival time: 18 days). In the context of village-based pig production, the longer time from infection to death in native ML pigs means that incubating or early sick pigs are likely to be sold once an outbreak of CSF is recognized in a village. This increased longevity probably contributes to the maintenance and spread of disease in a population where generally the contact rate is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17243474     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-006-4434-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  12 in total

1.  STUDIES ON THE COMPARATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF WILD EUROPEAN AND DOMESTIC SWINE TO HOG CHOLERA.

Authors:  M BRUGH; J W FOSTER; F A HAYES
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 1.156

2.  Influence of breed-related factors on the course of classical swine fever virus infection.

Authors:  K R Depner; U Hinrichs; K Bickhardt; I Greiser-Wilke; J Pohlenz; V Moennig; B Liess
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1997-05-10       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  An improved ELISA for the detection of serum antibodies directed against classical swine fever virus.

Authors:  E O Colijn; M Bloemraad; G Wensvoort
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  An experimental infection with classical swine fever virus in weaner pigs. I. Transmission of the virus, course of the disease, and antibody response.

Authors:  H Laevens; F Koenen; H Deluyker; D Berkvens; A de Kruif
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.320

5.  Experimental infection of slaughter pigs with classical swine fever virus: transmission of the virus, course of the disease and antibody response.

Authors:  H Laevens; F Koenen; H Deluyker; A de Kruif
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1999-08-28       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Genetic typing of classical swine fever viruses from Lao PDR by analysis of the 5' non-coding region.

Authors:  Stuart D Blacksell; Syseng Khounsy; David B Boyle; Laurence J Gleeson; Harvey A Westbury; John S Mackenzie
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.332

7.  Experimental study of a mild virulence strain of hog cholera: individual variations and horizontal transmission.

Authors:  E Plateau; P Vannier; J P Tillon
Journal:  Zentralbl Veterinarmed B       Date:  1980

8.  Detection of antibodies against hog cholera virus and bovine viral diarrhea virus in porcine serum. A comparative examination using CF, PLA and NPLA assays.

Authors:  M H Jensen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.695

9.  Classical swine fever virus: a ring test to evaluate RT-PCR detection methods.

Authors:  D J Paton; A McGoldrick; S Belak; C Mittelholzer; F Koenen; H Vanderhallen; M Biagetti; G M De Mia; T Stadejek; M A Hofmann; B Thuer
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Detection of hog cholera virus antigens in experimentally-infected pigs using an antigen-capture ELISA.

Authors:  A D Shannon; C Morrissy; S G Mackintosh; H A Westbury
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  7 in total

1.  Diagnosis of classical swine fever virus in a limited resource setting: the influence of pig breed on methodology and sample selection.

Authors:  S Khounsy; L J Gleeson; D Van Aken; H A Westbury; S D Blacksell
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  Classical swine fever in India: current status and future perspective.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar Singh; Kaushal Kishore Rajak; Amit Kumar; Sharad Kumar Yadav
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Integrin β3 is required in infection and proliferation of classical swine fever virus.

Authors:  Weiwei Li; Gang Wang; Wulong Liang; Kai Kang; Kangkang Guo; Yanming Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Improved methods to capture the total societal benefits of zoonotic disease control: Demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of an integrated control programme for Taenia solium, soil transmitted helminths and classical swine fever in northern Lao PDR.

Authors:  Walter O Okello; Anna L Okello; Phouth Inthavong; Tassilo Tiemann; Ammaly Phengsivalouk; Brecht Devleesschauwer; Alexandra Shaw; John Allen
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-09-19

5.  Comparative analyses of host responses upon infection with moderately virulent classical swine fever virus in domestic pigs and wild boar.

Authors:  Anja Petrov; Ulrike Blohm; Martin Beer; Jana Pietschmann; Sandra Blome
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.099

6.  Antigenic characterization of classical swine fever virus YC11WB isolates from wild boar.

Authors:  Seong-In Lim; Yong Kwan Kim; Ji-Ae Lim; Song-Hee Han; Hee-Suk Hyun; Ki-Sun Kim; Bang-Hun Hyun; Jae-Jo Kim; In-Soo Cho; Jae-Young Song; Sung-Hyun Choi; Seung-Hoe Kim; Dong-Jun An
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 1.672

Review 7.  Classical Swine Fever-An Updated Review.

Authors:  Sandra Blome; Christoph Staubach; Julia Henke; Jolene Carlson; Martin Beer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.048

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.