OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the accuracy of 16-MDCT for evaluation of stent patency and in-stent stenosis in venous coronary bypass grafts. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients who had previous stent placements in stenosed venous coronary bypass grafts underwent contrast-enhanced MDCT of the heart (collimation, 16 x 0.75 mm; 120 kV; 550 mAs(eff)) and invasive coronary angiography. A total of 20 stents were evaluated: Vessel and stent diameters proximal to, distal to, and at various sites inside the stent were measured on both techniques, and Bland-Altman plots and correlations were calculated. Image noise and image quality were also assessed applying a Student's t test for data comparison of image noise. RESULTS: All 20 bypass stents were correctly classified as patent. Vessel diameters outside the stent showed an excellent correlation (r = 0.90) and in-stent diameters showed a good correlation (r = 0.72), with lower values for MDCT due to blooming artifacts. All significant in-stent stenoses were correctly classified. CONCLUSION: In patients suspected of bypass in-stent stenosis, 16-MDCT may be considered as a valuable alternative to conventional angiography for evaluating bypass patency and in-stent stenosis.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the accuracy of 16-MDCT for evaluation of stent patency and in-stent stenosis in venous coronary bypass grafts. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients who had previous stent placements in stenosed venous coronary bypass grafts underwent contrast-enhanced MDCT of the heart (collimation, 16 x 0.75 mm; 120 kV; 550 mAs(eff)) and invasive coronary angiography. A total of 20 stents were evaluated: Vessel and stent diameters proximal to, distal to, and at various sites inside the stent were measured on both techniques, and Bland-Altman plots and correlations were calculated. Image noise and image quality were also assessed applying a Student's t test for data comparison of image noise. RESULTS: All 20 bypass stents were correctly classified as patent. Vessel diameters outside the stent showed an excellent correlation (r = 0.90) and in-stent diameters showed a good correlation (r = 0.72), with lower values for MDCT due to blooming artifacts. All significant in-stent stenoses were correctly classified. CONCLUSION: In patients suspected of bypass in-stent stenosis, 16-MDCT may be considered as a valuable alternative to conventional angiography for evaluating bypass patency and in-stent stenosis.