Literature DB >> 17241844

Fourteen-day safety and acceptability study of the universal placebo gel.

Jill L Schwartz1, Susan A Ballagh, Cynthia Kwok, Christine K Mauck, Debra H Weiner, William F Rencher, Marianne M Callahan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of the so-called universal placebo compared to the polystyrene sulfonate (PSS) placebo on genital irritation.
DESIGN: A single-center, Phase I, randomized, closed-label study was performed to evaluate the genital irritation of microbicide placebo gels. Thirty healthy, sexually abstinent women were randomly assigned to apply 3.5 mL of either the universal placebo or the PSS placebo gel intravaginally twice daily for 14 days.
METHODS: Genital irritation was assessed by signs as seen on pelvic examination and colposcopy and reports of symptoms. Vaginal health was assessed by wet mounts, Gram stains for Nugent score and polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and semiquantitative vaginal cultures. Acceptability was assessed as reported on the follow-up questionnaire.
RESULTS: The universal placebo was less irritating than the PSS placebo with a lower proportion of women experiencing signs and/or symptoms of genital irritation throughout follow-up (36% compared to 80%, p=.0253). The universal placebo was associated with few and mild genital symptoms, few and minor colposcopic findings and good vaginal health with no clinically significant changes in genital flora. Most participants found the feel of the universal placebo gel neutral or pleasant, and all participants found it odorless.
CONCLUSIONS: The universal placebo appeared safe and acceptable when used twice daily for 14 days. The strategy of creating a de novo inert universal placebo is a successful approach. The universal placebo is appropriate for use as a placebo gel in HIV prevention trials with microbicide candidates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17241844     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  24 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of the Protein Microbicide 5P12-RANTES in Sheep following Single-Dose Vaginal Gel Administration.

Authors:  John W McBride; Nicola Dias; David Cameron; Robin E Offord; Oliver Hartley; Peter Boyd; Vicky L Kett; R Karl Malcolm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Non-aqueous silicone elastomer gels as a vaginal microbicide delivery system for the HIV-1 entry inhibitor maraviroc.

Authors:  Claire J Forbes; Deborah Lowry; Leslie Geer; Ronald S Veazey; Robin J Shattock; Per Johan Klasse; Mark Mitchnick; Laurie Goldman; Lara A Doyle; Brendan C O Muldoon; A David Woolfson; John P Moore; R Karl Malcolm
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  A randomized male tolerance study of dapivirine gel following multiple topical penile exposures (MTN 012/IPM 010).

Authors:  Ross D Cranston; Craig Hoesley; Alex Carballo-Diéguez; Craig W Hendrix; Marla Husnik; Lisa Levy; Wayne Hall; Lydia Soto-Torres; Annalene M Nel
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 2.205

Review 4.  Rectal microbicide development.

Authors:  Ian McGowan
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.283

5.  Predictors of using a microbicide-like product among adolescent girls.

Authors:  Mary B Short; Paul A Succop; Ana M Ugueto; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 6.  Rectal microbicide development.

Authors:  Ian McGowan; Charlene Dezzutti
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.291

7.  Microbicide excipients can greatly increase susceptibility to genital herpes transmission in the mouse.

Authors:  Thomas R Moench; Russell J Mumper; Timothy E Hoen; Mianmian Sun; Richard A Cone
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Assessment of a Microbicide Candidate among a Diverse Cohort of Urban Southern US Women and their Male Sexual Partners.

Authors:  Paula Frew; Kimberly Parker; Takeia Horton; Brooke Hixson; Lisa Flowers; Frances Priddy; Lisa Grohskopf; Christine Mauck; Kimberly Workowski
Journal:  J AIDS Clin Res       Date:  2012-07-03

9.  Appropriateness of hydroxyethylcellulose gel as a placebo control in vaginal microbicide trials: a comparison of the two control arms of HPTN 035.

Authors:  Barbra A Richardson; Cliff Kelly; Gita Ramjee; Thomas Fleming; Bonus Makanani; Sarah Roberts; Petina Musara; Nkhafwire Mkandawire; Thomas Moench; Anne Coletti; Lydia Soto-Torres; Salim A Karim
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  Does tenofovir gel or do other microbicide products affect detection of biomarkers of semen exposure in vitro?

Authors:  Margaret C Snead; Athena P Kourtis; Johan H Melendez; Carolyn M Black; Christine K Mauck; Ana Penman-Aguilar; Dorothy M Chaney; Maria F Gallo; Denise J Jamieson; Maurizio Macaluso; Gustavo F Doncel
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.