Literature DB >> 17241345

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for analysis of turkey cecal microbiota.

A J Scupham1, J A Jones, I V Wesley.   

Abstract

AIM: As a prelude to long-term studies to characterize the microbiota of the turkey ceca, 14 DNA isolation protocols were evaluated for their ability to reproducibly characterize microbial diversity. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Eight commercially available DNA extraction kits were assessed. DNA quantity and quality were assessed and competitive PCR was used to quantify the 16S bacterial rRNA genes. The Invitrogen Easy-DNA Kit extraction method for large samples yielded over eight times more DNA than any other method (3144 +/- 873 microg g(-1) of sample, P < 0.05). Bacterial and fungal species richness was estimated by Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis. The Invitrogen Easy-DNA Kit generated the greatest bacterial species richness (46 +/- 7 peaks) while Bio-Rad Aquapure yielded the highest fungal species richness (71 +/- 9.5 peaks).
CONCLUSION: Cluster analysis indicated different DNA extraction methods generated different microbial community compositions using the same cecal matrix from a single donor bird. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Optimized DNA extraction protocols Invitrogen Easy-DNA Kit extraction method for large samples and Bio-Rad Aquapure outperform other methods for extraction of DNA from poultry fecal samples, although these methods do not necessarily recover all available DNA. They will be used in future studies to monitor the dynamics of microbial communities of the avian ceca.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17241345     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03094.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  18 in total

1.  Lyophilization prior to direct DNA extraction from bovine feces improves the quantification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Delphine Rapp; John Waller; Gale Brightwell; Richard W Muirhead
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A hybrid DNA extraction method for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of bacterial communities from poultry production samples.

Authors:  Michael J Rothrock; Kelli L Hiett; John Gamble; Andrew C Caudill; Kellie M Cicconi-Hogan; J Gregory Caporaso
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens.

Authors:  Merlin W Ariefdjohan; Dennis A Savaiano; Cindy H Nakatsu
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 4.  Patterns and scales in gastrointestinal microbial ecology.

Authors:  J Gray Camp; Michelle Kanther; Ivana Semova; John F Rawls
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Structural and functional changes within the gut microbiota and susceptibility to Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Caná L Ross; Jennifer K Spinler; Tor C Savidge
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.331

6.  Microbial diversity and host-specific sequences of Canada goose feces.

Authors:  Jingrang Lu; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Stephen Hill; Thomas A Edge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  F5Evaluation of commercially available DNA extraction kits for the analysis of the broiler chicken cecal microbiota.

Authors:  Helga Pankoke; Irena Maus; Gunnar Loh; Andrea Hüser; Jana Seifert; Alexandra Tilker; Sarah Hark; Alexander Sczyrba; Stefan Pelzer; Jessica Kleinbölting
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  High-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons: effects of extraction procedure, primer length and annealing temperature.

Authors:  Martin J Sergeant; Chrystala Constantinidou; Tristan Cogan; Charles W Penn; Mark J Pallen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of methods for the extraction and purification of DNA from the human microbiome.

Authors:  Sanqing Yuan; Dora B Cohen; Jacques Ravel; Zaid Abdo; Larry J Forney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Age-related differences in the cloacal microbiota of a wild bird species.

Authors:  Wouter F D van Dongen; Joël White; Hanja B Brandl; Yoshan Moodley; Thomas Merkling; Sarah Leclaire; Pierrick Blanchard; Etienne Danchin; Scott A Hatch; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 2.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.