Literature DB >> 17240451

Known components of the immunoglobulin A:T mutational machinery are intact in Burkitt lymphoma cell lines with G:C bias.

Zheng Xiao1, Madhumita Ray, Chuancang Jiang, Alan B Clark, Igor B Rogozin, Marilyn Diaz.   

Abstract

The basis for mutations at A:T base pairs in immunoglobulin hypermutation and defining how AID interacts with the DNA of the immunoglobulin locus are major aspects of the immunoglobulin mutator mechanism where questions remain unanswered. Here, we examined the pattern of mutations generated in mice deficient in various DNA repair proteins implicated in A:T mutation and found a previously unappreciated bias at G:C base pairs in spectra from mice simultaneously deficient in DNA mismatch repair and uracil DNA glycosylase. This suggests a strand-biased DNA transaction for AID delivery which is then masked by the mechanism that introduces A:T mutations. Additionally, we asked if any of the known components of the A:T mutation machinery underscore the basis for the paucity of A:T mutations in the Burkitt lymphoma cell lines, Ramos and BL2. Ramos and BL2 cells were proficient in MSH2/MSH6-mediated mismatch repair, and express high levels of wild-type, full-length DNA polymerase eta. In addition, Ramos cells have high levels of uracil DNA glycosylase protein and are proficient in base excision repair. These results suggest that Burkitt lymphoma cell lines may be deficient in an unidentified factor that recruits the machinery necessary for A:T mutation or that AID-mediated cytosine deamination in these cells may be processed by conventional base excision repair truncating somatic hypermutation at the G:C phase. Either scenario suggests that cytosine deamination by AID is not enough to trigger A:T mutation, and that additional unidentified factors are required for full spectrum hypermutation in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17240451      PMCID: PMC1868521          DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Immunol        ISSN: 0161-5890            Impact factor:   4.407


  74 in total

1.  Somatic hypermutation of human immunoglobulin heavy chain genes: targeting of RGYW motifs on both DNA strands.

Authors:  T Dörner; S J Foster; N L Farner; P E Lipsky
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Somatic hypermutation in the heavy chain locus correlates with transcription.

Authors:  Y Fukita; H Jacobs; K Rajewsky
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 31.745

3.  The 5' hypermutation boundary of kappa chains is independent of local and neighbouring sequences and related to the distance from the initiation of transcription.

Authors:  C Rada; J Yélamos; W Dean; C Milstein
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 4.  Evolution of somatic hypermutation and gene conversion in adaptive immunity.

Authors:  M Diaz; M F Flajnik
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.988

5.  Hypermutation in Ig V genes from mice deficient in the MLH1 mismatch repair protein.

Authors:  Q H Phung; D B Winter; R Alrefai; P J Gearhart
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Mutational pattern of the nurse shark antigen receptor gene (NAR) is similar to that of mammalian Ig genes and to spontaneous mutations in evolution: the translesion synthesis model of somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  M Diaz; J Velez; M Singh; J Cerny; M F Flajnik
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.823

7.  Hot spot focusing of somatic hypermutation in MSH2-deficient mice suggests two stages of mutational targeting.

Authors:  C Rada; M R Ehrenstein; M S Neuberger; C Milstein
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 31.745

8.  Biochemical analysis of hypermutational targeting by wild type and mutant activation-induced cytidine deaminase.

Authors:  Ronda Bransteitter; Phuong Pham; Peter Calabrese; Myron F Goodman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes in memory B cells of DNA repair-deficient mice.

Authors:  H Jacobs; Y Fukita; G T van der Horst; J de Boer; G Weeda; J Essers; N de Wind; B P Engelward; L Samson; S Verbeek; J M de Murcia; G de Murcia; H te Riele; K Rajewsky
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  MSH2-MSH6 stimulates DNA polymerase eta, suggesting a role for A:T mutations in antibody genes.

Authors:  Teresa M Wilson; Alexandra Vaisman; Stella A Martomo; Patsa Sullivan; Li Lan; Fumio Hanaoka; Akira Yasui; Roger Woodgate; Patricia J Gearhart
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  13 in total

1.  Error-prone DNA repair activity during somatic hypermutation in shark B lymphocytes.

Authors:  Catherine Zhu; Ellen Hsu
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  JH6 downstream intronic sequence is dispensable for RNA polymerase II accumulation and somatic hypermutation of the variable gene in Ramos cells.

Authors:  Diana P Castiblanco; Darrell D Norton; Robert W Maul; Patricia J Gearhart
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.407

3.  The concerted action of Msh2 and UNG stimulates somatic hypermutation at A . T base pairs.

Authors:  Darina Frieder; Mani Larijani; Cathy Collins; Marc Shulman; Alberto Martin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  SHMTool: a webserver for comparative analysis of somatic hypermutation datasets.

Authors:  Thomas Maccarthy; Sergio Roa; Matthew D Scharff; Aviv Bergman
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-11-08

5.  V-region mutation in vitro, in vivo, and in silico reveal the importance of the enzymatic properties of AID and the sequence environment.

Authors:  Thomas MacCarthy; Susan L Kalis; Sergio Roa; Phuong Pham; Myron F Goodman; Matthew D Scharff; Aviv Bergman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  MSH2/MSH6 complex promotes error-free repair of AID-induced dU:G mispairs as well as error-prone hypermutation of A:T sites.

Authors:  Sergio Roa; Ziqiang Li; Jonathan U Peled; Chunfang Zhao; Winfried Edelmann; Matthew D Scharff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Hypermutation at A/T sites during G.U mismatch repair in vitro by human B-cell lysates.

Authors:  Phuong Pham; Ke Zhang; Myron F Goodman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Speckled-like pattern in the germinal center (SLIP-GC), a nuclear GTPase expressed in activation-induced deaminase-expressing lymphomas and germinal center B cells.

Authors:  Kathleen Richter; Sukhdev Brar; Madhumita Ray; Prapaporn Pisitkun; Silvia Bolland; Laurent Verkoczy; Marilyn Diaz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Application of the whole-transcriptome shotgun sequencing approach to the study of Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  I Iacobucci; A Ferrarini; M Sazzini; E Giacomelli; A Lonetti; L Xumerle; A Ferrari; C Papayannidis; G Malerba; D Luiselli; A Boattini; P Garagnani; A Vitale; S Soverini; F Pane; M Baccarani; M Delledonne; G Martinelli
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 11.037

10.  Expression of Constitutive Fusion of Ubiquitin to PCNA Restores the Level of Immunoglobulin A/T Mutations During Somatic Hypermutation in the Ramos Cell Line.

Authors:  Leticia K Lerner; Dorine Bonte; Morwenna Le Guillou; Mahwish Mian Mohammad; Zeinab Kasraian; Alain Sarasin; Emmanuelle Despras; Said Aoufouchi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 8.786

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.