Literature DB >> 17240394

Mechanisms of premating isolation between Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Helicoverpa assulta (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Qing-Lei Ming1, Yun-Hua Yan, Chen-Zhu Wang.   

Abstract

Helicoverpa armigera and Helicoverpa assulta are sympatric sibling species, and in the laboratory they can interbreed and produce viable offspring. To assess the contributions of temporal barriers and sexual barriers to premating isolation, we investigated both the temporal rhythms of calling behavior and pheromone titers of H. armigera and H. assulta females and the behavioral responses of males to conspecific and heterospecific calling females in a wind tunnel. Both H. armigera and H. assulta females called throughout the scotophase, and there was more calling during the second half of the scotophase than during the first half. Maximal pheromone titer and maximal calling activity in H. armigera synchronously occurred at the sixth hour into the scotophase, whereas, in H. assulta, the maximal pheromone titer occurred 2 h before the peak of calling. Pheromone blend ratios of the two species were opposite and, within each species, changes in the ratio within the scotophase and at different ages were relatively small. Males of both H. armigera and H. assulta responded strongly to their conspecific calling females in the wind tunnel and completed the whole courtship sequence. In contrast, they did not land and had no copulation attempts in response to heterospecific calling females. These results show that the two species do not have obvious temporal differences in calling behavior and pheromone production, and the specificity of sex pheromone blend emitted by females plays a key role in their premating isolation. In addition, we summarized the potential isolation mechanisms of H. armigera and H. assulta.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17240394     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1910            Impact factor:   2.354


  8 in total

1.  Using COI gene sequence to barcode two morphologically alike species: the cotton bollworm and the oriental tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  Qing-Qing Li; Di-Yan Li; Hui Ye; Xiao-Fei Liu; Wei Shi; Neng Cao; Yan-Qing Duan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Do Helicoverpa armigera Moths Signal Their Fecundity by Emission of an Antagonist?

Authors:  Gabriel P Hughes; Ring T Cardé
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Synchronous firing of antennal-lobe projection neurons encodes the behaviorally effective ratio of sex-pheromone components in male Manduca sexta.

Authors:  Joshua P Martin; Hong Lei; Jeffrey A Riffell; John G Hildebrand
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Identification and characterization of aldehyde oxidases (AOXs) in the cotton bollworm.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Yalin Liao
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-10-23

5.  Sublethal Effects of Neonicotinoid Insecticide on Calling Behavior and Pheromone Production of Tortricid Moths.

Authors:  Miguel A Navarro-Roldán; César Gemeno
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Comparative transcriptomics of the pheromone glands provides new insights into the differentiation of sex pheromone between two host populations of Chilo suppressalis.

Authors:  Shuang Guo; Zhong Tian; Wei-Li Quan; Dan Sun; Wen Liu; Xiao-Ping Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Peripheral coding of sex pheromone blends with reverse ratios in two helicoverpa species.

Authors:  Han Wu; Chao Hou; Ling-Qiao Huang; Fu-Shun Yan; Chen-Zhu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Specific olfactory neurons and glomeruli are associated to differences in behavioral responses to pheromone components between two Helicoverpa species.

Authors:  Han Wu; Meng Xu; Chao Hou; Ling-Qiao Huang; Jun-Feng Dong; Chen-Zhu Wang
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.