Literature DB >> 17239999

Biological safety concepts of genetically modified live bacterial vaccines.

Joachim Frey1.   

Abstract

Live vaccines possess the advantage of having access to induce cell-mediated and antibody-mediated immunity; thus in certain cases they are able to prevent infection, and not only disease. Furthermore, live vaccines, particularly bacterial live vaccines, are relatively cheap to produce and easy to apply. Hence they are suitable to immunize large communities or herds. The induction of both cell-mediated immunity as well as antibody-mediated immunity, which is particularly beneficial in inducing mucosal immune responses, is obtained by the vaccine-strain's ability to colonize and multiply in the host without causing disease. For this reason, live vaccines require attenuation of virulence of the bacterium to which immunity must be induced. Traditionally attenuation was achieved simply by multiple passages of the microorganism on growth medium, in animals, eggs or cell cultures or by chemical or physical mutagenesis, which resulted in random mutations that lead to attenuation. In contrast, novel molecular methods enable the development of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) targeted to specific genes that are particularly suited to induce attenuation or to reduce undesirable effects in the tissue in which the vaccine strains can multiply and survive. Since live vaccine strains (attenuated by natural selection or genetic engineering) are potentially released into the environment by the vaccinees, safety issues concerning the medical as well as environmental aspects must be considered. These involve (i) changes in cell, tissue and host tropism, (ii) virulence of the carrier through the incorporation of foreign genes, (iii) reversion to virulence by acquisition of complementation genes, (iv) exchange of genetic information with other vaccine or wild-type strains of the carrier organism and (v) spread of undesired genes such as antibiotic resistance genes. Before live vaccines are applied, the safety issues must be thoroughly evaluated case-by-case. Safety assessment includes knowledge of the precise function and genetic location of the genes to be mutated, their genetic stability, potential reversion mechanisms, possible recombination events with dormant genes, gene transfer to other organisms as well as gene acquisition from other organisms by phage transduction, transposition or plasmid transfer and cis- or trans-complementation. For this, GMOs that are constructed with modern techniques of genetic engineering display a significant advantage over random mutagenesis derived live organisms. The selection of suitable GMO candidate strains can be made under in vitro conditions using basic knowledge on molecular mechanisms of pathogenicity of the corresponding bacterial species rather than by in vivo testing of large numbers of random mutants. This leads to a more targeted safety testing on volunteers and to a reduction in the use of animal experimentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17239999     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.11.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  31 in total

1.  Increased Pho regulon activation correlates with decreased virulence of an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli O78 strain.

Authors:  Nicolas Bertrand; Sébastien Houle; Guillaume LeBihan; Édith Poirier; Charles M Dozois; Josée Harel
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Attenuation of bacterial virulence by quorum sensing-regulated lysis.

Authors:  Anisia J Silva; Jorge A Benitez; Jian-He Wu
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Enhanced priming of adaptive immunity by Mycobacterium smegmatis mutants with high-level protein secretion.

Authors:  Natalie Taylor; Faith Bahunde; Afton Thompson; Jae-Sung Yu; William R Jacobs; Norm L Letvin; Barton F Haynes; Sunhee Lee
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-07-11

4.  Fundamentals of Fish Vaccination.

Authors:  Megha Kadam Bedekar; Sajal Kole
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Unmarked insertional mutagenesis in the bovine pathogen Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides SC: characterization of a lppQ mutant.

Authors:  Carole Janis; Daniela Bischof; Géraldine Gourgues; Joachim Frey; Alain Blanchard; Pascal Sirand-Pugnet
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 6.  Exterior design: strategies for redecorating the bacterial surface with small molecules.

Authors:  Samir Gautam; Thomas J Gniadek; Taehan Kim; David A Spiegel
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 19.536

7.  Removal of heterologous sequences from Plasmodium falciparum mutants using FLPe-recombinase.

Authors:  Ben C L van Schaijk; Martijn W Vos; Chris J Janse; Robert W Sauerwein; Shahid M Khan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  D27-pLpxL, an avirulent strain of Yersinia pestis, primes T cells that protect against pneumonic plague.

Authors:  Frank M Szaba; Lawrence W Kummer; Lindsey B Wilhelm; Jr-Shiuan Lin; Michelle A Parent; Sara W Montminy-Paquette; Egil Lien; Lawrence L Johnson; Stephen T Smiley
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Braun lipoprotein (Lpp) contributes to virulence of yersiniae: potential role of Lpp in inducing bubonic and pneumonic plague.

Authors:  Jian Sha; Stacy L Agar; Wallace B Baze; Juan P Olano; Amin A Fadl; Tatiana E Erova; Shaofei Wang; Sheri M Foltz; Giovanni Suarez; Vladimir L Motin; Sadhana Chauhan; Gary R Klimpel; Johnny W Peterson; Ashok K Chopra
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Immunogenic and invasive properties of Brucella melitensis 16M outer membrane protein vaccine candidates identified via a reverse vaccinology approach.

Authors:  Gabriel Gomez; Jianwu Pei; Waithaka Mwangi; L Garry Adams; Allison Rice-Ficht; Thomas A Ficht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.