Literature DB >> 17238851

Changes in health-related quality of life in Greek adult patients 1 year after successful renal transplantation.

Aikaterini Balaska1, Panagiotis Moustafellos, Stavros Gourgiotis, Dimitrios Pistolas, Evangelos Hadjiyannakis, Vassilis Vougas, Spiros Drakopoulos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to compare and to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Greek adult transplant recipients before and 1 year after successful renal transplantation (RT) and to examine which parameters had the greatest effects on their HRQOL. The SF-36 survey score was used.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-five Greek hemodialysis patients underwent RT at the Transplant Unit of Evangelismos General Hospital of Athens, including 44 men and 41 women (mean age, 43.8 years; range, 21-59 years). Thirty-nine patients had received a kidney from a living-related donor, and 46 from a cadaver. The scale scores of a Greek version of the SF-36 survey were compared between the transplant and the hemodialysis patients. We also examined the relationships of the scale scores with the patients' age and the type of donor.
RESULTS: According to the SF-36 health survey, transplant recipients had better results for general health perception (P <or= .001), role-physical functioning (P <or= .01), role-emotional functioning (P <or= .01), and vitality (P < or=.01). In addition, the scale scores of physical functioning, general health, and vitality of the patients who were younger than 30 years old at the time of transplantation were significantly higher than those of the patients who were older than 30 years, while the scores of bodily pain, general health, and physical functioning were significantly lower in cadaveric graft recipients compared with living-related graft recipients.
CONCLUSIONS: The SF-36 health survey is a validated and comprehensive instrument for evaluating renal transplant patients' HRQOL. Our data demonstrate an improvement in HRQOL in renal transplant patients from before to 1 year after successful RT. The data also confirm that the recipients' age at transplantation and the type of donor were important factors affecting the HRQOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17238851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Transplant        ISSN: 1304-0855            Impact factor:   0.945


  8 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life of a very special population: monks of Holy Mountain Athos, Greece.

Authors:  K Merakou; E Kyklou; E Antoniadou; D Theodoridis; E Doufexis; A Barbouni
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Novel views on new-onset diabetes after transplantation: development, prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Manfred Hecking; Johannes Werzowa; Michael Haidinger; Walter H Hörl; Julio Pascual; Klemens Budde; Fu L Luan; Akinlolu Ojo; Aiko P J de Vries; Esteban Porrini; Giovanni Pacini; Friedrich K Port; Adnan Sharif; Marcus D Säemann
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Validation of the psychometrics properties of a French quality of life questionnaire among a cohort of renal transplant recipients less than one year.

Authors:  Davy Beauger; Dorothée Fruit; Claire Villeneuve; Marie-Laure Laroche; Elisabeth Jouve; Annick Rousseau; Laurent Boyer; Stéphanie Gentile
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Access to Transplantation and Transplant Outcome Measures (ATTOM): study protocol of a UK wide, in-depth, prospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Gabriel C Oniscu; Rommel Ravanan; Diana Wu; Andrea Gibbons; Bernadette Li; Charles Tomson; John L Forsythe; Clare Bradley; John Cairns; Christopher Dudley; Christopher J E Watson; Eleanor M Bolton; Heather Draper; Matthew Robb; Lisa Bradbury; Rishi Pruthi; Wendy Metcalfe; Damian Fogarty; Paul Roderick; J Andrew Bradley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments.

Authors:  Melanie Wyld; Rachael Lisa Morton; Andrew Hayen; Kirsten Howard; Angela Claire Webster
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Social and interpersonal relationship modifications after renal transplant. A statistic and epidemiologic evaluation.

Authors:  F Famà; E Micali; C Linard; M D Venuti; G Costantino; M Gioffrè-Florio
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2013-12

7.  Mapping health-related quality of life after kidney transplantation by group comparisons: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yiman Wang; Marc H Hemmelder; Willem Jan W Bos; Jaapjan D Snoep; Aiko P J de Vries; Friedo W Dekker; Yvette Meuleman
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  Better health-related quality of life in kidney transplant patients compared to chronic kidney disease patients with similar renal function.

Authors:  Jung-Hwa Ryu; Tai Yeon Koo; Han Ro; Jang-Hee Cho; Myung-Gyu Kim; Kyu Ha Huh; Jae Berm Park; Sik Lee; Seungyeup Han; Jayoun Kim; Kook-Hwan Oh; Jaeseok Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.