Literature DB >> 17238435

Extensible Stylesheet Language Formatting Objects (XSL-FO): a tool to transform patient data into attractive clinical reports.

Linas Simonaitis1, Anne Belsito, Jeff Warvel, Siu Hui, Clement J McDonald.   

Abstract

Clinicians at Wishard Hospital in Indianapolis print and carry clinical reports called "Pocket Rounds". This paper describes a new process we developed to improve these clinical reports. The heart of our new process is a World Wide Web Consortium standard: Extensible Stylesheet Language Formatting Objects (XSL-FO). Using XSL-FO stylesheets we generated Portable Document Format (PDF) and PostScript reports with complex formatting: columns, tables, borders, shading, indents, dividing lines. We observed patterns of clinical report printing during a eight month study period on three Medicine wards. Usage statistics indicated that clinicians accepted the new system enthusiastically: 78% of 26,418 reports were printed using the new system. We surveyed 67 clinical users. Respondents gave the new reports a rating of 4.2 (on a 5 point scale); they gave the old reports a rating of 3.4. The primary complaint was that it took longer to print the new reports. We believe that XSL-FO is a promising way to transform text data into functional and attractive clinical reports: relatively easy to implement and modify.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17238435      PMCID: PMC1839487     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of a printed patient summary document with its electronic equivalent: early results.

Authors:  S M Thomas; J M Overhage; J Warvel; C J McDonald
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

2.  The impact of anticipatory patient data displays on physician decision making: a pilot study.

Authors:  R B Elson; D P Connelly
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

3.  Reading is slower from CRT displays than from paper: attempts to isolate a single-variable explanation.

Authors:  J D Gould; L Alfaro; V Barnes; R Finn; N Grischkowsky; A Minuto
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Alternatives in medical record formats.

Authors:  J F Fries
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience.

Authors:  C J McDonald; J M Overhage; W M Tierney; P R Dexter; D K Martin; J G Suico; A Zafar; G Schadow; L Blevins; T Glazener; J Meeks-Johnson; L Lemmon; J Warvel; B Porterfield; J Warvel; P Cassidy; D Lindbergh; A Belsito; M Tucker; B Williams; C Wodniak
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Radical improvements in the display of clinical microbiology results: a Web-based clinical information system.

Authors:  K E Willard; D P Connelly; J R Johnson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Inpatient computer-based standing orders vs physician reminders to increase influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Paul R Dexter; Susan M Perkins; Kati S Maharry; Kathy Jones; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  The anaesthetic report: custom-made printouts from anaesthesia-information-management-systems using extensible stylesheet language transformation.

Authors:  Andreas Meyer-Bender; Richard Spitz; Bernhard Pollwein
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 2.502

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.