Literature DB >> 17238265

Optimizing fragment and scaffold docking by use of molecular interaction fingerprints.

Gilles Marcou1, Didier Rognan.   

Abstract

Protein-ligand interaction fingerprints have been used to postprocess docking poses of three ligand data sets: a set of 40 low-molecular-weight compounds from the Protein Data Bank, a collection of 40 scaffolds from pharmaceutically relevant protein ligands, and a database of 19 scaffolds extracted from true cdk2 inhibitors seeded in 2230 scaffold decoys. Four popular docking tools (FlexX, Glide, Gold, and Surflex) were used to generate poses for ligands of the three data sets. In all cases, scoring by the similarity of interaction fingerprints to a given reference was statistically superior to conventional scoring functions in posing low-molecular-weight fragments, predicting protein-bound scaffold coordinates according to the known binding mode of related ligands, and screening a scaffold library to enrich a hit list in true cdk2-targeted scaffolds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17238265     DOI: 10.1021/ci600342e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  103 in total

1.  Toward Learned Chemical Perception of Force Field Typing Rules.

Authors:  Camila Zanette; Caitlin C Bannan; Christopher I Bayly; Josh Fass; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Computational fragment-based screening using RosettaLigand: the SAMPL3 challenge.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Virtual target screening: validation using kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Daniel N Santiago; Yuri Pevzner; Ashley A Durand; MinhPhuong Tran; Rachel R Scheerer; Kenyon Daniel; Shen-Shu Sung; H Lee Woodcock; Wayne C Guida; Wesley H Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  SimiCon: a web tool for protein-ligand model comparison through calculation of equivalent atomic contacts.

Authors:  Manuel Rueda; Vsevolod Katritch; Eugene Raush; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Calculating Partition Coefficients of Small Molecules in Octanol/Water and Cyclohexane/Water.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Gaetano Calabró; Daisy Y Kyu; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Crystal structure-based virtual screening for fragment-like ligands of the human histamine H(1) receptor.

Authors:  Chris de Graaf; Albert J Kooistra; Henry F Vischer; Vsevolod Katritch; Martien Kuijer; Mitsunori Shiroishi; So Iwata; Tatsuro Shimamura; Raymond C Stevens; Iwan J P de Esch; Rob Leurs
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 7.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 8.  Chemogenomic approaches to rational drug design.

Authors:  D Rognan
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  De novo design of N-(pyridin-4-ylmethyl)aniline derivatives as KDR inhibitors: 3D-QSAR, molecular fragment replacement, protein-ligand interaction fingerprint, and ADMET prediction.

Authors:  Yanmin Zhang; Haichun Liu; Yu Jiao; Haoliang Yuan; Fengxiao Wang; Shuai Lu; Sihui Yao; Zhipeng Ke; Wenting Tai; Yulei Jiang; Yadong Chen; Tao Lu
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.943

10.  Characterization of small molecule binding. I. Accurate identification of strong inhibitors in virtual screening.

Authors:  Bo Ding; Jian Wang; Nan Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.