Literature DB >> 17237506

Environmental effects on gene expression phenotype have regional biases in the human genome.

Jung Kyoon Choi1, Sang Cheol Kim.   

Abstract

Phenotypic discordance between monozygotic twins, such as a difference in disease susceptibility, implicates the role of the environment in determining phenotype. To assess genomewide environmental effects on "gene expression phenotype," we employed a published microarray data set for twins. We found that variations in expression phenotypes between monozygotic twins have biases in their chromosomal locations. They also showed a strong inverse correlation with gene density. Genomic regions of low gene density were environmentally sensitive, containing genes involved in response to external signals, cell differentiation, and development, etc. Genetic factors were found to make no contribution to the observed regional biases, stressing the role of epigenetics. We propose that epigenetic modifications might occur more frequently in heterochromatic, gene-poor regions in response to environmental signals while gene-rich regions tend to remain in an active chromatin configuration for the constitutive expression of underlying genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17237506      PMCID: PMC1855137          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.069047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  30 in total

Review 1.  The genetics of variation in gene expression.

Authors:  Vivian G Cheung; Richard S Spielman
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Natural variation in human gene expression assessed in lymphoblastoid cells.

Authors:  Vivian G Cheung; Laura K Conlin; Teresa M Weber; Melissa Arcaro; Kuang-Yu Jen; Michael Morley; Richard S Spielman
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-02-03       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  The 3D structure of human chromosomes in cell nuclei.

Authors:  E Lukásová; S Kozubek; M Kozubek; M Falk; J Amrichová
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  An integrated epigenetic and genetic approach to common human disease.

Authors:  Hans T Bjornsson; M Daniele Fallin; Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Epigenetics and twins: three variations on the theme.

Authors:  Arturas Petronis
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Individuality and variation in gene expression patterns in human blood.

Authors:  Adeline R Whitney; Maximilian Diehn; Stephen J Popper; Ash A Alizadeh; Jennifer C Boldrick; David A Relman; Patrick O Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evidence for large domains of similarly expressed genes in the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Paul T Spellman; Gerald M Rubin
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2002-06-18

8.  Genetic analysis of genome-wide variation in human gene expression.

Authors:  Michael Morley; Cliona M Molony; Teresa M Weber; James L Devlin; Kathryn G Ewens; Richard S Spielman; Vivian G Cheung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Age-associated activation of epigenetically repressed genes in the mouse.

Authors:  Pamela E Bennett-Baker; Jodi Wilkowski; David T Burke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Chromosomal clustering of muscle-expressed genes in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Peter J Roy; Joshua M Stuart; Jim Lund; Stuart K Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Child health, developmental plasticity, and epigenetic programming.

Authors:  Z Hochberg; R Feil; M Constancia; M Fraga; C Junien; J-C Carel; P Boileau; Y Le Bouc; C L Deal; K Lillycrop; R Scharfmann; A Sheppard; M Skinner; M Szyf; R A Waterland; D J Waxman; E Whitelaw; K Ong; K Albertsson-Wikland
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Hematopoiesis is not clonal in healthy elderly women.

Authors:  Sabina I Swierczek; Neeraj Agarwal; Roberto H Nussenzveig; Gerald Rothstein; Andrew Wilson; Andrew Artz; Josef T Prchal
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Using Transcriptomic Hidden Variables to Infer Context-Specific Genotype Effects in the Brain.

Authors:  Bernard Ng; William Casazza; Ellis Patrick; Shinya Tasaki; Gherman Novakovsky; Daniel Felsky; Yiyi Ma; David A Bennett; Chris Gaiteri; Philip L De Jager; Sara Mostafavi
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Looking beyond the DNA sequence: the relevance of DNA methylation processes for the stress-diathesis model of depression.

Authors:  Linda Booij; Dongsha Wang; Mélissa L Lévesque; Richard E Tremblay; Moshe Szyf
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Up regulated virulence genes in M. tuberculosis H37Rv gleaned from genome wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Rohini Kumari; Pramod Katara
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2021-06-30

6.  Screening for clonal hematopoiesis as a predictive marker for development of therapy-related myeloid neoplasia (t-MN) following neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study (S0012).

Authors:  Marilyn L Slovak; Victoria Bedell; Danika Lew; Kathy S Albain; Georgiana K Ellis; Robert B Livingston; Silvana Martino; Edith A Perez; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Dorie Sher; Wendy Stock
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Animal models of gene-nutrient interactions.

Authors:  Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Neonatal DNA methylation profile in human twins is specified by a complex interplay between intrauterine environmental and genetic factors, subject to tissue-specific influence.

Authors:  Lavinia Gordon; Jihoon E Joo; Joseph E Powell; Miina Ollikainen; Boris Novakovic; Xin Li; Roberta Andronikos; Mark N Cruickshank; Karen N Conneely; Alicia K Smith; Reid S Alisch; Ruth Morley; Peter M Visscher; Jeffrey M Craig; Richard Saffery
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 9.  Using "-omics" Data to Inform Genome-wide Association Studies (GWASs) in the Osteoporosis Field.

Authors:  Abdullah Abood; Charles R Farber
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  The Brisbane Systems Genetics Study: genetical genomics meets complex trait genetics.

Authors:  Joseph E Powell; Anjali K Henders; Allan F McRae; Anthony Caracella; Sara Smith; Margaret J Wright; John B Whitfield; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Nicholas G Martin; Peter M Visscher; Grant W Montgomery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.