Literature DB >> 17237095

Using an alignment of fragment strings for comparing protein structures.

Iddo Friedberg1, Tim Harder, Rachel Kolodny, Einat Sitbon, Zhanwen Li, Adam Godzik.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Most methods that are used to compare protein structures use three-dimensional (3D) structural information. At the same time, it has been shown that a 1D string representation of local protein structure retains a degree of structural information. This type of representation can be a powerful tool for protein structure comparison and classification, given the arsenal of sequence comparison tools developed by computational biology. However, in order to do so, there is a need to first understand how much information is contained in various possible 1D representations of protein structure.
RESULTS: Here we describe the use of a particular structure fragment library, denoted here as KL-strings, for the 1D representation of protein structure. Using KL-strings, we develop an infrastructure for comparing protein structures with a 1D representation. This study focuses on the added value gained from such a description. We show the new local structure language adds resolution to the traditional three-state (helix, strand and coil) secondary structure description, and provides a high degree of accuracy in recognizing structural similarities when used with a pairwise alignment benchmark. The results of this study have immediate applications towards fast structure recognition, and for fold prediction and classification.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17237095     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  16 in total

1.  Reducing the dimensionality of the protein-folding search problem.

Authors:  George D Chellapa; George D Rose
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  GOSSIP: a method for fast and accurate global alignment of protein structures.

Authors:  I Kifer; R Nussinov; H J Wolfson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  FragBag, an accurate representation of protein structure, retrieves structural neighbors from the entire PDB quickly and accurately.

Authors:  Inbal Budowski-Tal; Yuval Nov; Rachel Kolodny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Toward a "structural BLAST": using structural relationships to infer function.

Authors:  Fabian Dey; Qiangfeng Cliff Zhang; Donald Petrey; Barry Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Structural alphabets derived from attractors in conformational space.

Authors:  Alessandro Pandini; Arianna Fornili; Jens Kleinjung
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Structural alphabets for protein structure classification: a comparison study.

Authors:  Quan Le; Gianluca Pollastri; Patrice Koehl
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Enhanced fold recognition using efficient short fragment clustering.

Authors:  Evgeny Krissinel
Journal:  J Mol Biochem       Date:  2012-06-16

8.  Local conformational changes in the DNA interfaces of proteins.

Authors:  Tomoko Sunami; Hidetoshi Kono
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multiple structure alignment with msTALI.

Authors:  Paul Shealy; Homayoun Valafar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  iPBA: a tool for protein structure comparison using sequence alignment strategies.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Gelly; Agnel Praveen Joseph; Narayanaswamy Srinivasan; Alexandre G de Brevern
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.