Literature DB >> 17236977

A model for predicting lung cancer response to therapy.

Rebecca M Seibert1, Chester R Ramsey, J Wesley Hines, Patrick A Kupelian, Katja M Langen, Sanford L Meeks, Daniel D Scaperoth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Volumetric computed tomography (CT) images acquired by image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) systems can be used to measure tumor response over the course of treatment. Predictive adaptive therapy is a novel treatment technique that uses volumetric IGRT data to actively predict the future tumor response to therapy during the first few weeks of IGRT treatment. The goal of this study was to develop and test a model for predicting lung tumor response during IGRT treatment using serial megavoltage CT (MVCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Tumor responses were measured for 20 lung cancer lesions in 17 patients that were imaged and treated with helical tomotherapy with doses ranging from 2.0 to 2.5 Gy per fraction. Five patients were treated with concurrent chemotherapy, and 1 patient was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor response to treatment was retrospectively measured by contouring 480 serial MVCT images acquired before treatment. A nonparametric, memory-based locally weight regression (LWR) model was developed for predicting tumor response using the retrospective tumor response data. This model predicts future tumor volumes and the associated confidence intervals based on limited observations during the first 2 weeks of treatment. The predictive accuracy of the model was tested using a leave-one-out cross-validation technique with the measured tumor responses.
RESULTS: The predictive algorithm was used to compare predicted verse-measured tumor volume response for all 20 lesions. The average error for the predictions of the final tumor volume was 12%, with the true volumes always bounded by the 95% confidence interval. The greatest model uncertainty occurred near the middle of the course of treatment, in which the tumor response relationships were more complex, the model has less information, and the predictors were more varied. The optimal days for measuring the tumor response on the MVCT images were on elapsed Days 1, 2, 5, 9, 11, 12, 17, and 18 during treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The LWR model accurately predicted final tumor volume for all 20 lung cancer lesions. These predictions were made using only 8 days' worth of observations from early in the treatment. Because the predictions are accurate with quantified uncertainty, they could eventually be used to optimize treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17236977     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

1.  Localization accuracy of the clinical target volume during image-guided radiotherapy of lung cancer.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Hugo; Elisabeth Weiss; Ahmed Badawi; Matthew Orton
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Palliative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy For Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Previously Treated By Induction Chemotherapy.

Authors:  George A Plataniotis; Maria-Aikaterini Theofanopoulou; Konstantinia Sotiriadou; Kyriaki Theodorou; Panagiotis Mavroidis; George Kyrgias
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Predictive treatment management: incorporating a predictive tumor response model into robust prospective treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Pengpeng Zhang; Ellen Yorke; Yu-Chi Hu; Gig Mageras; Andreas Rimner; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Radiomics in precision medicine for lung cancer.

Authors:  Julie Constanzo; Lise Wei; Huan-Hsin Tseng; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12

5.  Forecasting longitudinal changes in oropharyngeal tumor morphology throughout the course of head and neck radiation therapy.

Authors:  Adam D Yock; Arvind Rao; Lei Dong; Beth M Beadle; Adam S Garden; Rajat J Kudchadker; Laurence E Court
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Utilization of a hybrid finite-element based registration method to quantify heterogeneous tumor response for adaptive treatment for lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Hoda Sharifi; Hong Zhang; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Wei Lu; Munther I Ajlouni; Jian-Yue Jin; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Indrin J Chetty; Hualiang Zhong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Improving counterfactual reasoning with kernelised dynamic mixing models.

Authors:  Sonali Parbhoo; Omer Gottesman; Andrew Slavin Ross; Matthieu Komorowski; Aldo Faisal; Isabella Bon; Volker Roth; Finale Doshi-Velez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Modeling of non-small cell lung cancer volume changes during CT-based image guided radiotherapy: patterns observed and clinical implications.

Authors:  Hiram A Gay; Quendella Q Taylor; Fumika Kiriyama; Geoffrey T Dieck; Todd Jenkins; Paul Walker; Ron R Allison; Paolo Ubezio
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.238

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.