Literature DB >> 17236825

Systematic and comprehensive strategy for reducing matrix effects in LC/MS/MS analyses.

Erin Chambers1, Diane M Wagrowski-Diehl, Ziling Lu, Jeffrey R Mazzeo.   

Abstract

A systematic, comprehensive strategy that optimizes sample preparation and chromatography to minimize matrix effects in bioanalytical LC/MS/MS assays was developed. Comparisons were made among several sample preparation methods, including protein precipitation (PPT), liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), pure cation exchange solid-phase extraction (SPE), reversed-phase SPE and mixed-mode SPE. The influence of mobile phase pH and gradient duration on the selectivity and sensitivity for both matrix components and basic analytes was investigated. Matrix effects and overall sensitivity and resolution between UPLC technology and HPLC were compared. The amount of specific matrix components, or class of matrix components, was measured in the sample preparation extracts by LC/MS/MS with electrospray ionization (ESI) using both precursor ion scanning mode and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). PPT is the least effective sample preparation technique, often resulting in significant matrix effects due to the presence of many residual matrix components. Reversed-phase and pure cation exchange SPE methods resulted in cleaner extracts and reduced matrix effects compared to PPT. The cleanest extracts, however, were produced with polymeric mixed-mode SPE (both reversed-phase and ion exchange retention mechanisms). These mixed-mode sorbents dramatically reduced the levels of residual matrix components from biological samples, leading to significant reduction in matrix effects. LLE also provided clean final extracts. However, analyte recovery, particularly for polar analytes, was very low. Mobile phase pH was manipulated to alter the retention of basic compounds relative to phospholipids, whose retention tends to be relatively independent of pH. In addition to the expected resolution, speed and sensitivity benefits of UPLC technology, a paired t-test demonstrated a statistically significant improvement with respect to matrix effects when this technology was chosen over traditional HPLC. The combination of polymeric mixed-mode SPE, the appropriate mobile phase pH and UPLC technology provides significant advantages for reducing matrix effects resulting from plasma matrix components and in improving the ruggedness and sensitivity of bioanalytical methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17236825     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  67 in total

1.  A method for monitoring and controlling reproducibility of intensity data in complex electrospray mass spectra: a thermometer ion-based strategy.

Authors:  Paolo Lecchi; Jinghua Zhao; Wesley S Wiggins; Tzong-Hao Chen; Ping F Yip; Brian C Mansfield; John M Peltier
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 2.  Biological Matrix Effects in Quantitative Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Analytical Methods: Advancing Biomonitoring.

Authors:  Parinya Panuwet; Ronald E Hunter; Priya E D'Souza; Xianyu Chen; Samantha A Radford; Jordan R Cohen; M Elizabeth Marder; Kostya Kartavenka; P Barry Ryan; Dana Boyd Barr
Journal:  Crit Rev Anal Chem       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.535

3.  Lipidomic profiling reveals distinct differences in plasma lipid composition in healthy, prediabetic, and type 2 diabetic individuals.

Authors:  Huanzi Zhong; Chao Fang; Yanqun Fan; Yan Lu; Bo Wen; Huahui Ren; Guixue Hou; Fangming Yang; Hailiang Xie; Zhuye Jie; Ye Peng; Zhiqiang Ye; Jiegen Wu; Jin Zi; Guoqing Zhao; Jiayu Chen; Xiao Bao; Yihe Hu; Yan Gao; Jun Zhang; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Lise Madsen; Karsten Kristiansen; Chuanming Ni; Junhua Li; Siqi Liu
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 4.  Toward sensitive and accurate analysis of antibody biotherapeutics by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Bo An; Ming Zhang; Jun Qu
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 5.  The use of mass spectrometry for analysing metabolite biomarkers in epidemiology: methodological and statistical considerations for application to large numbers of biological samples.

Authors:  Mads V Lind; Otto I Savolainen; Alastair B Ross
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Targeted quantification of lipid mediators in skeletal muscles using restricted access media-based trap-and-elute liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Zhiying Wang; Liangqiao Bian; Chenglin Mo; Maciej Kukula; Kevin A Schug; Marco Brotto
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 6.558

7.  Decline patterns and risk assessment of 10 multi-class pesticides in young sprout amaranth (Amaranthus mangostanus) under greenhouse growing conditions.

Authors:  In Kyung Kim; Sung-Woo Kim; A M Abd El-Aty; Md Musfiqur Rahman; Md Humayun Kabir; Han Sol Lee; Hyung Suk Chung; Ji Hoon Jeong; Ho-Chul Shin; Jae-Han Shim
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Aspects of matrix and analyte effects in clinical pharmacokinetic sample analyses using LC-ESI/MS/MS - Two case examples.

Authors:  Guohua An; Thanh Bach; Inas Abdallah; Demet Nalbant
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 9.  Intracellular Pharmacokinetics of Antiretroviral Drugs in HIV-Infected Patients, and their Correlation with Drug Action.

Authors:  Caroline Bazzoli; Vincent Jullien; Clotilde Le Tiec; Elisabeth Rey; France Mentré; Anne-Marie Taburet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Quantitative hydrophilic interaction chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of N-acetylneuraminic acid and N-acetylmannosamine in human plasma.

Authors:  Yifan Shi; Xin Xu; Meng Fang; Michael Zhang; Yinghe Li; Brad Gillespie; Selwyn Yorke; Nora Yang; John C McKew; William A Gahl; Marjan Huizing; Nuria Carrillo-Carrasco; Amy Qiu Wang
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.