Steven J Ondersma1, Dace S Svikis, Charles R Schuster. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48207, USA. s.ondersma@wayne.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Drug use among parenting women is a significant risk factor for a range of negative child outcomes, including exposure to violence, child maltreatment, and child behavior problems. Implementation of brief interventions with this population may be greatly facilitated by computer-based interventions. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial with 4-month follow-up. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 107 postpartum women recruited from an urban obstetric hospital primarily serving a low-income population. Women were randomized into assessment only versus assessment plus brief intervention conditions; 76 (71%) returned for follow-up evaluation. INTERVENTION: A 20-minute, single-session, computer-based motivational intervention (based on motivational interviewing methods), combined with two nontailored mailings and voucher-based reinforcement of attendance at an initial intake/treatment session. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Illicit drug use as measured by qualitative urinalysis and self-report. RESULTS: Frequency of illicit drug use other than marijuana increased slightly for the control group, but declined among intervention group participants (p<0.05, between-group Mann-Whitney U; d=0.50); the magnitude of intervention effects on changes in marijuana use frequency was similar, but did not reach statistical significance. Point-prevalence analysis at follow-up did not show significant group differences in drug use. However, trends under a range of assumptions regarding participants lost to follow-up all favored the intervention group, with most effect sizes in the moderate range (odds ratios 1.4 to 4.7). CONCLUSIONS: Results tentatively support the efficacy of this high-reach, replicable brief intervention. Further research should seek to replicate these findings and to further develop the computer as a platform for validated brief interventions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Drug use among parenting women is a significant risk factor for a range of negative child outcomes, including exposure to violence, child maltreatment, and child behavior problems. Implementation of brief interventions with this population may be greatly facilitated by computer-based interventions. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial with 4-month follow-up. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 107 postpartum women recruited from an urban obstetric hospital primarily serving a low-income population. Women were randomized into assessment only versus assessment plus brief intervention conditions; 76 (71%) returned for follow-up evaluation. INTERVENTION: A 20-minute, single-session, computer-based motivational intervention (based on motivational interviewing methods), combined with two nontailored mailings and voucher-based reinforcement of attendance at an initial intake/treatment session. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Illicit drug use as measured by qualitative urinalysis and self-report. RESULTS: Frequency of illicit drug use other than marijuana increased slightly for the control group, but declined among intervention group participants (p<0.05, between-group Mann-Whitney U; d=0.50); the magnitude of intervention effects on changes in marijuana use frequency was similar, but did not reach statistical significance. Point-prevalence analysis at follow-up did not show significant group differences in drug use. However, trends under a range of assumptions regarding participants lost to follow-up all favored the intervention group, with most effect sizes in the moderate range (odds ratios 1.4 to 4.7). CONCLUSIONS: Results tentatively support the efficacy of this high-reach, replicable brief intervention. Further research should seek to replicate these findings and to further develop the computer as a platform for validated brief interventions.
Authors: Michael F Fleming; Marlon P Mundt; Michael T French; Linda Baier Manwell; Ellyn A Stauffacher; Kristen Lawton Barry Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: James O Prochaska; Wayne F Velicer; Colleen Redding; Joseph S Rossi; Michael Goldstein; Judith DePue; Geoffrey W Greene; Susan R Rossi; Xiaowu Sun; Joseph L Fava; Robert Laforge; William Rakowski; Brett A Plummer Journal: Prev Med Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Gary L Rhodes; Karen K Saules; Todd C Helmus; John Roll; Renee S Beshears; David M Ledgerwood; Charles R Schuster Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2003 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Faye S Taxman; Scott T Walters; Lincoln B Sloas; Jennifer Lerch; Mayra Rodriguez Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Robert P Schwartz; Jan Gryczynski; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Arturo Gonzales; Ana Moseley; Thomas R Peterson; Steven J Ondersma; Kevin E O'Grady Journal: Addiction Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 6.526