Literature DB >> 17236126

Magnification endoscopy for diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease: a proposal of diagnostic criteria and critical analysis of observer variability.

A Edebo1, W Tam, M Bruno, A-M Van Berkel, C Jönson, M Schoeman, G Tytgat, J Dent, L Lundell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This study tested the diagnostic value of high-resolution endoscopy for the recognition of subtle diagnostic esophageal mucosal changes in nonerosive reflux disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten control subjects and eleven patients with nonerosive reflux disease confirmed by a validated questionnaire, standard endoscopy, and 24-hour pH-metry participated in the study. Still images were collected by high-resolution endoscopes from the distal esophagus in a standardized manner, incorporating iodine staining. Assessments were repeated in the patients with reflux disease after 4 weeks of esomeprazole therapy. Interobserver variability in the recognition of the proposed criteria was initially evaluated by 27 endoscopists using an Internet-based process. After optimisation of image quality the evaluation was repeated face-to-face with six expert endoscopists.
RESULTS: No criterion was identified in either assessment that was sufficiently sensitive and specific to patients with reflux disease to be clinically useful. The kappa value, used to assess interobserver variation, was acceptably high only for invisibility of palisade vessels (0.59). Triangular indentations, apical mucosal breaks, and pinpoint blood vessels at the squamocolumnar junction were identified more frequently in the patients with reflux disease ( P < 0.05). These changes and the invisibility of the palisade vessels were significantly less prevalent in reflux patients after therapy ( P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Though some distal esophageal mucosal appearances observed with the high-resolution endoscope appeared to be related to nonerosive esophageal mucosal injury, none of these changes proved to be sufficiently sensitive and specific to justify their use as a diagnostic criterion for nonerosive reflux disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17236126     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-945112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  12 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced endoscopic imaging and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Rupa Banerjee; D Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-19

2.  A critical review of endoscopic indices in ulcerative colitis: inter-observer variation of the endoscopic index.

Authors:  Fumihito Hirai; Toshiyuki Matsui
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-27

3.  Role of digital chromoendoscopy in detecting minimal change esophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Roongruedee Chaiteerakij; Rungsun Rerknimitr; Pinit Kullavanijaya
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-04-16

Review 4.  Narrow band imaging with magnification for the diagnosis of lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Rajvinder Singh; Asif Hussain; Cheong Kuan Loong
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-12-16

Review 5.  [Bronchopulmonary manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease].

Authors:  M V Malfertheiner; A Kandulski; P Malfertheiner; J Schreiber
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Diagnosis and management of non-erosive reflux disease--the Vevey NERD Consensus Group.

Authors:  I M Modlin; R H Hunt; P Malfertheiner; P Moayyedi; E M Quigley; G N J Tytgat; J Tack; R C Heading; G Holtman; S F Moss
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Ambulatory 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and high resolution endoscopy distinguish patients with non-erosive reflux disease from those with functional heartburn.

Authors:  Chuanlian Chu; Quanlin Du; Changqing Li; Linlu Zhang; Xiaoyan Zhou; Fang Zuo; Yanmin Zhang; Fang Li; Guofeng Xie; Yanqing Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  i-Scan detection of minimal change esophagitis in dyspeptic patients with or without Gastroesophageal Reflux disease.

Authors:  Nisa Netinatsunton; Jaksin Sottisuporn; Siriboon Attasaranya; Teepawit Witeerungrot; Naichaya Chamroonkul; Theeratus Jongboonyanuparp; Alan Geater; Bancha Ovartlarnporn
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Linked color imaging improves visibility of reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Takeda; Daisuke Asaoka; Daiki Abe; Maiko Suzuki; Yuta Nakagawa; Hitoshi Sasaki; Yoshihiro Inami; Muneo Ikemura; Hisanori Utsunomiya; Shotaro Oki; Nobuyuki Suzuki; Atsushi Ikeda; Noboru Yatagai; Hiroyuki Komori; Yoichi Akazawa; Kohei Matsumoto; Kumiko Ueda; Hiroya Ueyama; Yuji Shimada; Kenshi Matsumoto; Mariko Hojo; Taro Osada; Shuko Nojiri; Akihito Nagahara
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Efficacy of DA-5204 (Stillen 2X) for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Jae Ho Cho; Hyuk Yoon; Cheol Min Shin; Young Soo Park; Nayoung Kim; Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.