Literature DB >> 17236101

Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and/or O3 on intra- and interspecific competitive ability of aspen.

M E Kubiske1, V S Quinn, P E Marquardt, D F Karnosky.   

Abstract

Three model communities of trembling aspen (monoculture, and mixed with either paper birch or sugar maple) were grown for seven years in elevated atmospheric CO(2) and O(3) using Free Air CO(2) Enrichment (FACE) technology. We utilized trends in species' importance, calculated as an index of volume growth and survival, as indications of shifting community composition. For the pure aspen communities, different clones emerged as having the highest change in relative importance values depending on the pollutant exposure. In the control and elevated CO(2) treatments, clone 42E was rapidly becoming the most successful clone while under elevated O(3), clone 8 L emerged as the dominant clone. In fact, growth of clone 8 L was greater in the elevated O(3) treatment compared to controls. For the mixed aspen-birch community, importance of aspen and birch changed by - 16 % and + 62 %, respectively, in the controls. In the treatments, however, importance of aspen and birch changed by - 27 % and + 87 %, respectively, in elevated O(3), and by - 10 % and + 45 %, respectively, in elevated CO(2). Thus, the presence of elevated O(3) hastened conversion of stands to paper birch, whereas the presence of elevated CO(2) delayed it. Relative importance of aspen and maple changed by - 2 % and + 3 %, respectively, after seven years in the control treatments. But in elevated O(3), relative importance of aspen and maple changed by - 2 % and + 5 %, respectively, and in elevated CO(2) by + 9 and - 20 %, respectively. Thus, elevated O(3) slightly increases the rate of conversion of aspen stands to sugar maple, but maple is placed at a competitive disadvantage to aspen under elevated CO(2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17236101     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-924760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)        ISSN: 1435-8603            Impact factor:   3.081


  10 in total

1.  Performance and secondary chemistry of two hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. x Populus tremuloides Michx.) clones in long-term elevated ozone exposure.

Authors:  E Häikiö; M Makkonen; R Julkunen-Tiitto; J Sitte; V Freiwald; T Silfver; V Pandey; E Beuker; T Holopainen; E Oksanen
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Atmospheric change alters foliar quality of host trees and performance of two outbreak insect species.

Authors:  John J Couture; Timothy D Meehan; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Tropospheric Ozone on Phytochemical Composition of Trembling Aspen ( Populus tremuloides ) and Paper Birch ( Betula papyrifera ).

Authors:  John J Couture; Timothy D Meehan; Kennedy F Rubert-Nason; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Global transcriptomic profiling of aspen trees under elevated [CO2] to identify potential molecular mechanisms responsible for enhanced radial growth.

Authors:  Hairong Wei; Jiqing Gou; Yordan Yordanov; Huaxin Zhang; Ramesh Thakur; Wendy Jones; Andrew Burton
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Elevated CO2 and O3 effects on ectomycorrhizal fungal root tip communities in consideration of a post-agricultural soil nutrient gradient legacy.

Authors:  Carrie Andrew; Erik A Lilleskov
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.387

6.  Inter-genotypic differences in drought tolerance of maritime pine are modified by elevated [CO2].

Authors:  David Sánchez-Gómez; José A Mancha; M Teresa Cervera; Ismael Aranda
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Elevated carbon dioxide and ozone alter productivity and ecosystem carbon content in northern temperate forests.

Authors:  Alan F Talhelm; Kurt S Pregitzer; Mark E Kubiske; Donald R Zak; Courtney E Campany; Andrew J Burton; Richard E Dickson; George R Hendrey; J G Isebrands; Keith F Lewin; John Nagy; David F Karnosky
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Forests and ozone: productivity, carbon storage, and feedbacks.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Herman H Shugart; Jacquelyn K Shuman; Manuel T Lerdau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Cell Wall Metabolism in Response to Abiotic Stress.

Authors:  Hyacinthe Le Gall; Florian Philippe; Jean-Marc Domon; Françoise Gillet; Jérôme Pelloux; Catherine Rayon
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-16

Review 10.  Current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes.

Authors:  Jürg Fuhrer; Maria Val Martin; Gina Mills; Colette L Heald; Harry Harmens; Felicity Hayes; Katrina Sharps; Jürgen Bender; Mike R Ashmore
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.