OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability to teach scleroderma experts and young rheumatologists to perform the modified Rodnan skin score test. METHODS: Three international "teaching courses for teachers" were conducted with 6-9 experts who performed 3-9 skin score tests each. In addition, an international course for 90 young rheumatologists, in which 18 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) participated, was also organised. Finally, a local repeated training course for 5-9 rheumatologists was performed, in which 6-7 patients with SSc participated. RESULTS: When 6-9 scleroderma specialists investigated the patients, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed "good" to "excellent" values (0.865 and 0.710, respectively). When 90 young rheumatologists were involved in one teaching course, the coefficient of variation (CV) was relatively satisfactory (35%) owing to the high number of investigators, and with a considerable within-patient SD value of 5.4. Repeated teaching of 5-9 young rheumatologists in local courses clearly improved the consistency. The ICC increased from 0.496 to a "good" level of 0.722. The within-patient SD values for intraobserver variability ranged between 2.5 and 2.9. The intraobserver CV was about 20%. CONCLUSIONS: This study strongly supports the need for standardisation among different centres when using skin scoring for clinical trials. The intraobserver variability and within-patient SD values can be significantly reduced by repeated teaching. For inexperienced rheumatologists, at least one repeated teaching course is needed.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability to teach scleroderma experts and young rheumatologists to perform the modified Rodnan skin score test. METHODS: Three international "teaching courses for teachers" were conducted with 6-9 experts who performed 3-9 skin score tests each. In addition, an international course for 90 young rheumatologists, in which 18 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) participated, was also organised. Finally, a local repeated training course for 5-9 rheumatologists was performed, in which 6-7 patients with SSc participated. RESULTS: When 6-9 scleroderma specialists investigated the patients, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed "good" to "excellent" values (0.865 and 0.710, respectively). When 90 young rheumatologists were involved in one teaching course, the coefficient of variation (CV) was relatively satisfactory (35%) owing to the high number of investigators, and with a considerable within-patient SD value of 5.4. Repeated teaching of 5-9 young rheumatologists in local courses clearly improved the consistency. The ICC increased from 0.496 to a "good" level of 0.722. The within-patient SD values for intraobserver variability ranged between 2.5 and 2.9. The intraobserver CV was about 20%. CONCLUSIONS: This study strongly supports the need for standardisation among different centres when using skin scoring for clinical trials. The intraobserver variability and within-patient SD values can be significantly reduced by repeated teaching. For inexperienced rheumatologists, at least one repeated teaching course is needed.
Authors: P J Clements; E L Hurwitz; W K Wong; J R Seibold; M Mayes; B White; F Wigley; M Weisman; W Barr; L Moreland; T A Medsger; V D Steen; R W Martin; D Collier; A Weinstein; E Lally; J Varga; S R Weiner; B Andrews; M Abeles; D E Furst Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2000-11
Authors: P J Clements; P A Lachenbruch; J R Seibold; B Zee; V D Steen; P Brennan; A J Silman; N Allegar; J Varga; M Massa Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: J E Pope; M Baron; N Bellamy; J Campbell; S Carette; I Chalmers; P Dales; J Hanly; E A Kaminska; P Lee Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1995-07 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: P Clements; P Lachenbruch; J Siebold; B White; S Weiner; R Martin; A Weinstein; M Weisman; M Mayes; D Collier Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1995-07 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Ki Won Moon; Ran Song; Jin Hyun Kim; Eun Young Lee; Eun Bong Lee; Yeong Wook Song Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Marwin Gutierrez; Carlos Pineda; Tomas Cazenave; Marco Piras; Gian Luca Erre; Antonella Draghessi; Rossella De Angelis; Walter Grassi Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Dinesh Khanna; Daniel E Furst; Philip J Clements; Yannick Allanore; Murray Baron; Lazlo Czirjak; Oliver Distler; Ivan Foeldvari; Masataka Kuwana; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Maureen Mayes; Thomas Medsger; Peter A Merkel; Janet E Pope; James R Seibold; Virginia Steen; Wendy Stevens; Christopher P Denton Journal: J Scleroderma Relat Disord Date: 2017 Jan-Apr
Authors: Thaschawee Arkachaisri; Soamarat Vilaiyuk; Suzanne Li; Kathleen M O'Neil; Elena Pope; Gloria C Higgins; Marilynn Punaro; Egla C Rabinovich; Margalit Rosenkranz; Daniel A Kietz; Paul Rosen; Steven J Spalding; Teresa R Hennon; Kathryn S Torok; Elaine Cassidy; Thomas A Medsger Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Dimitrios Daoussis; Stamatis-Nick C Liossis; Athanassios C Tsamandas; Christina Kalogeropoulou; Alexandra Kazantzi; Chaido Sirinian; Maria Karampetsou; Georgios Yiannopoulos; Andrew P Andonopoulos Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 7.580