Literature DB >> 17234618

Predicting the energy cost of terrestrial locomotion: a test of the LiMb model in humans and quadrupeds.

Herman Pontzer1.   

Abstract

The energy cost of terrestrial locomotion has been linked to the muscle forces generated to support body weight and swing the limbs. The LiMb model predicts these forces, and hence locomotor cost, as a function of limb length and basic kinematic variables. Here, I test this model in humans, goats and dogs in order to assess the performance of the LiMb model in predicting locomotor cost for bipeds and quadrupeds. Model predictions were compared to observed locomotor cost, measured via oxygen consumption, during treadmill trials performed over a range of speeds for both walking and running gaits. The LiMb model explained more of the variation in locomotor cost than other predictors, including contact time, Froude number and body mass. The LiMb model also accurately predicted the magnitude of vertical ground forces. Results suggest the LiMb model reliably links locomotor anatomy to force production and locomotor cost. Further, these data support the idea that limb length may underlie the scaling of locomotor cost for terrestrial animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17234618     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  20 in total

1.  Unsteady locomotion: integrating muscle function with whole body dynamics and neuromuscular control.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener; Monica A Daley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Locomotor energetics in primates: gait mechanics and their relationship to the energetics of vertical and horizontal locomotion.

Authors:  Jandy B Hanna; Daniel Schmitt
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Pelvic Breadth and Locomotor Kinematics in Human Evolution.

Authors:  Laura Tobias Gruss; Richard Gruss; Daniel Schmitt
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Connecting the legs with a spring improves human running economy.

Authors:  Cole S Simpson; Cara G Welker; Scott D Uhlrich; Sean M Sketch; Rachel W Jackson; Scott L Delp; Steve H Collins; Jessica C Selinger; Elliot W Hawkes
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Two explanations for the compliant running paradox: reduced work of bouncing viscera and increased stability in uneven terrain.

Authors:  Monica A Daley; James R Usherwood
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Walking, running, and resting under time, distance, and average speed constraints: optimality of walk-run-rest mixtures.

Authors:  Leroy L Long; Manoj Srinivasan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Chimpanzee locomotor energetics and the origin of human bipedalism.

Authors:  Michael D Sockol; David A Raichlen; Herman Pontzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Partitioning the metabolic cost of human running: a task-by-task approach.

Authors:  Christopher J Arellano; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.326

9.  Children and adults minimise activated muscle volume by selecting gait parameters that balance gross mechanical power and work demands.

Authors:  Tatjana Y Hubel; James R Usherwood
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The human foot and heel-sole-toe walking strategy: a mechanism enabling an inverted pendular gait with low isometric muscle force?

Authors:  J R Usherwood; A J Channon; J P Myatt; J W Rankin; T Y Hubel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.