Literature DB >> 17234477

Family presence and surveillance during weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Mary Beth Happ1, Valerie A Swigart, Judith A Tate, Robert M Arnold, Susan M Sereika, Leslie A Hoffman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The research was designed to describe the care and communication processes during weaning from long-term mechanical ventilation (LTMV). A portion of those findings, specifically, how family members interact with the patient and respond to the ventilator and associated intensive care unit bedside equipment during LTMV weaning, are reported here.
METHODS: Ethnography was conducted in a medical intensive care unit (MICU) and step-down MICU following 30 adults who were being weaned from LTMV (>4 days). Data collection involved field observations conducted from November 2001 to July 2003; interviews with patients, family members, and MICU clinicians; and clinical record review.
RESULTS: Family members were present at the patients' bedside during 46% of weaning trials and interacted with patients through touch, talking, and surveillance. Families' bedside surveillance activities were interpretive of numeric monitor displays and laboratory values, protective of patient safety and comfort, and often focused exclusively on weaning. Interpretive language and surveillance were learned from and imitative of clinician behaviors. Clinicians characterized the family's presence as helpful, a hindrance, or having no effect on the weaning process. Quantitative analysis using random coefficient modeling examining the effect of family presence on length of weaning trials showed significantly longer daily weaning trials when families were present (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: Critical care clinicians influence families' acquisition of interpretive surveillance skills at the bedside of patients who are being weaned from LTMV. This study provides a potentially useful conceptual framework of family behaviors with long-term critically ill patients that could enhance the dialogue about family-centered care and guide future research on family presence in the intensive care unit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17234477      PMCID: PMC2077984          DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  42 in total

1.  Withdrawal of life support: intensive caring at the end of life.

Authors:  Thomas J Prendergast; Kathleen A Puntillo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Perspectives on family-centered, flexible visitation in the intensive care unit setting.

Authors:  Margaret Slota; Dan Shearn; Kymberli Potersnak; Linda Haas
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Family-centered critical care: a practical approach to making it happen.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Henneman; Suzette Cardin
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.708

4.  Life support withdrawal: communication and conflict.

Authors:  Sally A Norton; Virginia P Tilden; Susan W Tolle; Christine A Nelson; Susan Talamantes Eggman
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 5.  Technology and humane nursing care: (ir)reconcilable or invented difference?

Authors:  A Barnard; M Sandelowski
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients.

Authors:  V P Tilden; S W Tolle; C A Nelson; J Fields
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  The need to know: experiences of critically ill patients.

Authors:  J E Hupcey; H E Zimmerman
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Patient-family-nurse interactions in the trauma-resuscitation room.

Authors:  Janice M Morse; Charlotte Pooler
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  The Caregiver Vigilance Scale: application and validation in the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH) project.

Authors:  Diane Feeney Mahoney; Richard N Jones; David W Coon; Aaron B Mendelsohn; Laura N Gitlin; Marcia Ory
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.035

10.  Electronic voice-output communication aids for temporarily nonspeaking patients in a medical intensive care unit: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Mary Beth Happ; Tricia Kenney Roesch; Kathryn Garrett
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.210

View more
  10 in total

1.  Use of augmentative and alternative communication strategies by family members in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Lauren M Broyles; Judith A Tate; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Variation in long-term acute care hospital use after intensive care.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Rachel M Werner; Shannon S Carson; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Qualitative Secondary Analysis: A Case Exemplar.

Authors:  Judith Ann Tate; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  J Pediatr Health Care       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 1.812

4.  Factors Influencing Active Family Engagement in Care Among Critical Care Nurses.

Authors:  Breanna Hetland; Ronald Hickman; Natalie McAndrew; Barbara Daly
Journal:  AACN Adv Crit Care       Date:  2017

5.  The association between bathing and weaning trial duration.

Authors:  Susan M Sereika; Judith A Tate; Dana DiVirgilio-Thomas; Leslie A Hoffman; Valerie A Swigart; Lauren Broyles; Tricia Roesch; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.210

6.  Wash and wean: bathing patients undergoing weaning trials during prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Mary Beth Happ; Judith A Tate; Valerie A Swigart; Dana DiVirgilio-Thomas; Leslie A Hoffman
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 2.210

7.  Anxiety and agitation in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Judith Ann Tate; Annette Devito Dabbs; Leslie A Hoffman; Eric Milbrandt; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2011-09-09

Review 8.  Mixed methods in gerontological research.

Authors:  Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.571

9.  The effect of sensory stimulation provided by family on arterial blood oxygen saturation in critical care patients.

Authors:  Hojatollah Yousefi; Mojgan Naderi; Reza Daryabeigi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

Review 10.  Patient and family involvement in adult critical and intensive care settings: a scoping review.

Authors:  Michelle Olding; Sarah E McMillan; Scott Reeves; Madeline H Schmitt; Kathleen Puntillo; Simon Kitto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.377

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.