Literature DB >> 17234365

Combinations of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, mean corpuscular erythrocyte volume, gamma-glutamyltransferase, homocysteine and folate increase the significance of biological markers in alcohol dependent patients.

Daniela Rinck1, Helge Frieling, Anne Freitag, Thomas Hillemacher, Kristina Bayerlein, Johannes Kornhuber, Stefan Bleich.   

Abstract

AIMS: The traditionally used biological markers for alcoholism include a wide range of sensitivity and specificity as single tests. This study focuses on the combination of established laboratory parameters with new meaningful biomarkers to advance the significance regarding alcohol dependence.
DESIGN: We analyzed blood samples from alcohol-dependent patients (n=177) compared with a control group (n=181). In the statistical calculation we included carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT), mean corpuscular erythrocyte volume (MCV), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), total plasma homocysteine, and folate.
RESULTS: None of the examined biomarkers reached sensitivity above 90% while all markers showed a good specificity. Combinations of different markers led to a significant elevation in sensitivity. Best values for men were achieved by using a combination of MCV, CDT, GGT, homocysteine and folate in different weightings (sensitivity: 98.6%, specificity: 86.4%). For women, similar results were yielded by combining MCV and CDT (sensitivity: 94.1%, specificity: 96%). The addition of homocysteine and folate in different weightings did not result in further enhancement.
CONCLUSIONS: Gender-specific clusters including MCV, CDT, GGT, homocysteine and folate led to an increase in sensitivity compared to single laboratory markers. This is a reliable help to identify patients with regular heavy drinking in clinical practice which might prevent further complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17234365     DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  9 in total

1.  Future prospects for biomarkers of alcohol consumption and alcohol-induced disorders.

Authors:  Willard M Freeman; Kent E Vrana
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  Circulating cytokines as biomarkers of alcohol abuse and alcoholism.

Authors:  Rajeshwara N Achur; Willard M Freeman; Kent E Vrana
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Review of current clinical biomarkers for the detection of alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Hamid R Tavakoli; Michael Hull; Lt Michael Okasinski
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-03

4.  Blood markers of alcohol use in epistaxis patients.

Authors:  Michael B Soyka; Thomas Schrepfer; David Holzmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Diagnostic performance of ethyl glucuronide in hair for the investigation of alcohol drinking behavior: a comparison with traditional biomarkers.

Authors:  Hicham Kharbouche; Mohamed Faouzi; Nathalie Sanchez; Jean Bernard Daeppen; Marc Augsburger; Patrice Mangin; Christian Staub; Frank Sporkert
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 6.  Protein biomarkers of alcohol abuse.

Authors:  Mariana P Torrente; Willard M Freeman; Kent E Vrana
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.940

7.  Usefulness of Gamma Glutamyl Transferase as Reliable Biological Marker in Objective Corroboration of Relapse in Alcohol Dependent Patients.

Authors:  Siddharth Dixit; Parduman Singh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01

8.  KASL clinical practice guidelines: management of alcoholic liver disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2013-09-30

9.  Association between Serum Gamma-glutamyl transferase and Intracranial Arterial Calcification in Acute Ischemic Stroke Subjects.

Authors:  Tao Yao; Jing Li; Qi Long; Gang Li; Yanbin Ding; Qin Cui; Zhichao Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.