Literature DB >> 17234015

Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs.

Michael F Drummond1, David A Wilson, Panos Kanavos, Peter Ubel, Joan Rovira.   

Abstract

Historically, patients with rare diseases have been underserved by commercial drug development. In several jurisdictions, specific legislation has been enacted to encourage the development of drugs for rare diseases (orphan drugs), which would otherwise not be commercially viable. However, because of the small market, these drugs are often very expensive. Under the standard methods of health technology assessment (HTA) incorporating economic evaluation, orphan drugs do not usually prove to be cost-effective and this, coupled with their high cost, means that funding and patient access may be limited. However, these restrictions may not be in line with societal preferences. Therefore, this study discusses whether the standard methods of HTA are adequate for assisting decisions on patient access to and funding of orphan drugs and outlines a research agenda to help understand the societal value of orphan drugs and issues surrounding their development, funding, and use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17234015     DOI: 10.1017/S0266462307051550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  68 in total

1.  Availability of and access to orphan drugs: an international comparison of pharmaceutical treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension, Fabry disease, hereditary angioedema and chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Carl Rudolf Blankart; Tom Stargardt; Jonas Schreyögg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Eliciting preferences for prioritizing treatment of rare diseases: the role of opportunity costs and framing effects.

Authors:  Arna S Desser; Jan Abel Olsen; Sverre Grepperud
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Orphan drugs for rare diseases: is it time to revisit their special market access status?

Authors:  Steven Simoens; David Cassiman; Marc Dooms; Eline Picavet
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Using value-of-information methods when the disease is rare and the treatment is expensive--the example of hemophilia A.

Authors:  Lusine Abrahamyan; Andrew R Willan; Joseph Beyene; Marjorie Mclimont; Victor Blanchette; Brian M Feldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Access to orphan drugs despite poor quality of clinical evidence.

Authors:  Alain G Dupont; Philippe B Van Wilder
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Are some QALYs more equal than others?

Authors:  E J van de Wetering; N J A van Exel; J M Rose; R J Hoefman; W B F Brouwer
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-12-06

7.  Rare is frequent and frequent is costly: rare diseases as a challenge for health care systems.

Authors:  J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg; Martin Frank
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-03

8.  No difference in between-country variability in use of newly approved orphan and non- orphan medicinal products--a pilot study.

Authors:  Pieter Stolk; Harald E Heemstra; Hubert G M Leufkens; Brigitte Bloechl-Daum; Eibert R Heerdink
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 4.123

9.  Societal views on orphan drugs: cross sectional survey of Norwegians aged 40 to 67.

Authors:  Arna S Desser; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Jan Abel Olsen; Sverre Grepperud; Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-09-22

10.  Therapeutic efficacy of α-1 antitrypsin augmentation therapy on the loss of lung tissue: an integrated analysis of 2 randomised clinical trials using computed tomography densitometry.

Authors:  Robert A Stockley; David G Parr; Eeva Piitulainen; Jan Stolk; Berend C Stoel; Asger Dirksen
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2010-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.