Literature DB >> 17233858

Do women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia prefer a see and treat option in colposcopy?

L Balasubramani1, S Orbell, M Hagger, V Brown, J Tidy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare women's experiences of either see and treat (ST) or defer and treat (DT) at first visit to colposcopy following abnormal cytology.
DESIGN: A prospective postal questionnaire survey.
SETTING: Colposcopy clinics of a University Hospital. SAMPLE: A total of 272 women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) referred to colposcopy.
METHODS: A total of 136 women receiving ST and a matched sample of women receiving DT (N = 136) were sent a postal questionnaire 7 days after first appointment at colposcopy to assess evaluations of their experience, psychological distress and relief. Subsequent appointment keeping was extracted from medical records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anxiety and subsequent behaviour.
RESULTS: Women undergoing ST were significantly less anxious and more relieved than those undergoing DT. They also evaluated their first appointment as more motivationally congruent. While women undergoing ST were less likely than DTs to keep their second appointment, there was no overall difference in did not attend (DNA) rates at 15-month follow up.
CONCLUSIONS: ST is psychologically beneficial and may be preferred by women with CIN2/3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17233858     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01160.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  7 in total

1.  See-and-Treat Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for High-Grade Cervical Cytology: Are We Overtreating?

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Lauren M Bergeron; Feng Gao; Premal H Thaker; Leslie S Massad
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  'I Want the Whole Package'. Elderly Patients' Preferences for Follow-Up After Abnormal Cervical Test Results: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Pia Kirkegaard; Line Winther Gustafson; Lone Kjeld Petersen; Berit Andersen
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia After Negative Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Laura James-Nywening; Ningying Wu; Jingxia Liu; Matthew A Powell; Premal H Thaker; L Stewart Massad
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Biopsy and selective recall compared with immediate large loop excision in management of women with low grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

5.  Long-term psychosocial impact of alternative management policies in women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  L Sharp; S Cotton; N Gray; M Avis; I Russell; L Walker; N Waugh; D Whynes; C Woolley; A Thornton; L Smart; M Cruickshank; J Little
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Psychological distress in cervical cancer screening: results from a German online survey.

Authors:  M Jentschke; R Lehmann; N Drews; A Hansel; M Schmitz; P Hillemanns
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Options for managing low grade cervical abnormalities detected at screening: cost effectiveness study.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.