Literature DB >> 17233564

A comparison of statistical tests for detecting differential expression using Affymetrix oligonucleotide microarrays.

Saran Vardhanabhuti1, Steven J Blakemore, Steven M Clark, Sujoy Ghosh, Richard J Stephens, Dilip Rajagopalan.   

Abstract

Signal quantification and detection of differential expression are critical steps in the analysis of Affymetrix microarray data. Many methods have been proposed in the literature for each of these steps. The goal of this paper is to evaluate several signal quantification methods (GCRMA, RSVD, VSN, MAS5, and Resolver) and statistical methods for differential expression (t test, Cyber-T, SAM, LPE, RankProducts, Resolver RatioBuild). Our particular focus is on the ability to detect differential expression via statistical tests. We have used two different datasets for our evaluation. First, we have used the HG-U133 Latin Square spike in dataset developed by Affymetrix. Second, we have used data from an in-house rat liver transcriptomics study following 30 different drug treatments generated using the Affymetrix RAE230A chip. Our overall recommendation based on this study is to use GCRMA for signal quantification. For detection of differential expression, GCRMA coupled with Cyber-T or SAM is the best approach, as measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The integrated pipeline in Resolver RatioBuild combining signal quantification and detection of differential expression is an equally good alternative for detecting differentially expressed genes. For most of the differential expression algorithms we considered, the performance using MAS5 signal quantification was inferior to that of the other methods we evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17233564     DOI: 10.1089/omi.2006.10.555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  14 in total

1.  Finding differentially expressed genes in two-channel DNA microarray datasets: how to increase reliability of data preprocessing.

Authors:  Ana Rotter; Matjaz Hren; Spela Baebler; Andrej Blejec; Kristina Gruden
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2008-09

2.  Ecological genetics and genomics of plant defenses: Evidence and approaches.

Authors:  Jill T Anderson; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.608

3.  Do current bladder smooth muscle cell isolation procedures result in a homogeneous cell population? Implications for bladder tissue engineering.

Authors:  Arun K Sharma; Jena L Donovan; Jennifer A Hagerty; Ryan R Sullivan; Seby L Edassery; Daniel A Harrington; Earl Y Cheng
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  A comprehensive and universal method for assessing the performance of differential gene expression analyses.

Authors:  Mikhail G Dozmorov; Joel M Guthridge; Robert E Hurst; Igor M Dozmorov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Candidate gene prioritization by network analysis of differential expression using machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Daniela Nitsch; Joana P Gonçalves; Fabian Ojeda; Bart de Moor; Yves Moreau
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Genome-wide expression analysis identifies a modulator of ionizing radiation-induced p53-independent apoptosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Petra van Bergeijk; Joseph Heimiller; Lyle Uyetake; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Distinct cardiac transcriptional profiles defining pregnancy and exercise.

Authors:  Eunhee Chung; Joseph Heimiller; Leslie A Leinwand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Gene Vector Analysis (Geneva): a unified method to detect differentially-regulated gene sets and similar microarray experiments.

Authors:  Stephen W Tanner; Pankaj Agarwal
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Background correction using dinucleotide affinities improves the performance of GCRMA.

Authors:  Raad Z Gharaibeh; Anthony A Fodor; Cynthia J Gibas
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  EzArray: a web-based highly automated Affymetrix expression array data management and analysis system.

Authors:  Yuerong Zhu; Yuelin Zhu; Wei Xu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.