Literature DB >> 17233285

A comparison of changes over time in cervical foraminal height after tricortical iliac graft or polyetheretherketone cage placement following anterior discectomy.

Suat E Celik1, Ayhan Kara, Sevinç Celik.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors prospectively evaluated cervical foraminal height changes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. To their knowledge, this prospective study is the first in which foraminal height changes over time are compared following the placement of a tricortical graft or a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.
METHODS: The patients were randomly divided in two groups. In one group, 30 patients underwent anterior cervical microdiscectomy and free bone graft (FBG) insertion at 46 levels via the Smith-Robinson technique. The FBG was harvested from the right iliac crest. Another 35 patients underwent the same operation, but fusion was provided by the insertion of PEEK intervertebral cages at 41 levels. Fusion status and the C2-7 Cobb angle, interspace height, and foraminal height changes were observed on anterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs obtained at the 18-month follow-up examination. There were no differences between the groups with regard to clinical recovery, fusion status, and Cobb angle. A significant interspace height reduction was observed in the FBG group during the 1st postoperative month. In the FBG group, the mean heights (+/- standard deviation) of the foramina were 8.2 +/- 2.7 mm preoperatively, 10.8 +/- 2.6 mm on postoperative Day 2, and 8.1 +/- 1.5 mm after 18 months of follow up. In the PEEK cage group, the mean heights were 8.4 +/- 2.8 mm preoperatively, 10.3 +/- 1.1 mm on postoperative Day 2, and 9.6 +/- 1.2 mm after 18 months of follow up. The increase in foraminal height was significantly preserved at the 6th, 12th, and 18th months in the cage group.
CONCLUSIONS: In both groups the foraminal height increased sufficiently and the nerve root was decompressed postoperatively. The PEEK cages may provide sufficient preservation of foraminal height even 1.5 years after the operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17233285     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  14 in total

1.  Plate augmentation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage for degenerative cervical spinal disorders.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Cyrus E Taghavi; Margaret S Hsu; Kwang-Bok Lee; Gyu-Hyung Kim; Ji-Hoon Song
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Efficacy of PEEK cages and plate augmentation in three-level anterior cervical fusion of elderly patients.

Authors:  Kyung Jin Song; Gyu Hyung Kim; Byeong Yeol Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-02-15

3.  Influence of cervical bone mineral density on cage subsidence in patients following stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Christopher Brenke; Martin Dostal; Johann Scharf; Christel Weiß; Kirsten Schmieder; Martin Barth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Porous silicon nitride spacers versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical and radiological results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Jasper F C Wolfs; Terry P Corbin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with bone morphogenic protein and demineralised bone matrix in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Rob D Dickerman; Ashley S Reynolds; Brent Morgan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Clinical and radiological comparison of femur and fibular allografts for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases.

Authors:  Hyeong-Seok Oh; Chan Shik Shim; Jin-Sung Kim; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-01-31

Review 7.  Factors influencing surgical outcome after anterior stabilization of the cervical spine with heterogeneous material.

Authors:  Athanasios K Petridis; Sabrina Sechting; Michael Budde; Alexandros Doukas; Homajoun Maslehaty; Hubertus Maximilian Mehdorn
Journal:  Clin Pract       Date:  2012-05-29

8.  Cervical foraminal and discal height after dynamic rotational plating in the cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Jin-Oh Park; Moon Soo Park; Seong-Hwan Moon; In-Sung Kim; Seok Woo Kim; Yong-Chan Kim; Tae-Hwan Kim; Bo-Kyung Suh; Ji Hoon Nam; Hwan-Mo Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-11-28

9.  ISASS Policy Statement - cervical interbody.

Authors:  Kern Singh; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

10.  The CASCADE trial: effectiveness of ceramic versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy with interbody fusion; protocol of a blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Jasper F C Wolfs; Terry P Corbin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.