BACKGROUND: Risk factors for primary infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and its subtypes have not been fully investigated. METHODS: Questionnaires and serum samples from a total of 2006 students who entered Edinburgh University in 1999-2000 were analyzed to examine risk factors for EBV seropositivity, both overall and by EBV type. RESULTS: The prevalence of EBV seropositivity was significantly increased among females, older students, those who had lived in tropical countries, those with siblings, and those who were sexually active, particularly if they had had numerous sex partners. Risk was lower (1) among students who always used a condom than among those who had sexual intercourse without one and (2) among female oral-contraceptive users than among sexually active nonusers. Risk factors for type 1 EBV infection were similar to those for EBV overall. No associations were found between nonsexual risk factors and type 2 infection. Sexual activity increased the risk of type 2 infection, but the increase in risk with number of sex partners was less consistent than for type 1 infections. Dual infection was uncommon, but the patterns of risk appeared to be similar to those of type 1 infection. CONCLUSION: This study provides further evidence that EBV may be sexually transmitted and some suggestion that the risk factors for type 1 and type 2 infection differ.
BACKGROUND: Risk factors for primary infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and its subtypes have not been fully investigated. METHODS: Questionnaires and serum samples from a total of 2006 students who entered Edinburgh University in 1999-2000 were analyzed to examine risk factors for EBV seropositivity, both overall and by EBV type. RESULTS: The prevalence of EBV seropositivity was significantly increased among females, older students, those who had lived in tropical countries, those with siblings, and those who were sexually active, particularly if they had had numerous sex partners. Risk was lower (1) among students who always used a condom than among those who had sexual intercourse without one and (2) among female oral-contraceptive users than among sexually active nonusers. Risk factors for type 1 EBVinfection were similar to those for EBV overall. No associations were found between nonsexual risk factors and type 2 infection. Sexual activity increased the risk of type 2 infection, but the increase in risk with number of sex partners was less consistent than for type 1 infections. Dual infection was uncommon, but the patterns of risk appeared to be similar to those of type 1 infection. CONCLUSION: This study provides further evidence that EBV may be sexually transmitted and some suggestion that the risk factors for type 1 and type 2 infection differ.
Authors: Peter A Maple; Alberto Ascherio; Jeffrey I Cohen; Gary Cutter; Gavin Giovannoni; Claire Shannon-Lowe; Radu Tanasescu; Bruno Gran Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Lucy Pembrey; Pauline Raynor; Paul Griffiths; Shelley Chaytor; John Wright; Andrew J Hall Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Freida Blostein; Sydney Foote; Elizabeth Salzman; Daniel W McNeil; Mary L Marazita; Emily T Martin; Betsy Foxman Journal: J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 5.235
Authors: Nora Mutalima; Elizabeth Molyneux; Harold Jaffe; Steve Kamiza; Eric Borgstein; Nyengo Mkandawire; George Liomba; Mkume Batumba; Dimitrios Lagos; Fiona Gratrix; Chris Boshoff; Delphine Casabonne; Lucy M Carpenter; Robert Newton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Elizabeth Visser; Denis Milne; Ian Collacott; David McLernon; Carl Counsell; Mark Vickers Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 3.090