Literature DB >> 17229836

Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences.

Demis Hassabis1, Dharshan Kumaran, Seralynne D Vann, Eleanor A Maguire.   

Abstract

Amnesic patients have a well established deficit in remembering their past experiences. Surprisingly, however, the question as to whether such patients can imagine new experiences has not been formally addressed to our knowledge. We tested whether a group of amnesic patients with primary damage to the hippocampus bilaterally could construct new imagined experiences in response to short verbal cues that outlined a range of simple commonplace scenarios. Our results revealed that patients were markedly impaired relative to matched control subjects at imagining new experiences. Moreover, we identified a possible source for this deficit. The patients' imagined experiences lacked spatial coherence, consisting instead of fragmented images in the absence of a holistic representation of the environmental setting. The hippocampus, therefore, may make a critical contribution to the creation of new experiences by providing the spatial context into which the disparate elements of an experience can be bound. Given how closely imagined experiences match episodic memories, the absence of this function mediated by the hippocampus, may also fundamentally affect the ability to vividly re-experience the past.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17229836      PMCID: PMC1773058          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0610561104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

1.  Remembering our past: functional neuroanatomy of recollection of recent and very remote personal events.

Authors:  Asaf Gilboa; Gordon Winocur; Cheryl L Grady; Stephanie J Hevenor; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Recollective qualities modulate hippocampal activation during autobiographical memory retrieval.

Authors:  Donna Rose Addis; Morris Moscovitch; Adrian P Crawley; Mary Pat McAndrews
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  A comparison and evaluation of the predictions of relational and conjunctive accounts of hippocampal function.

Authors:  Sandra N Moses; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 4.  Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory.

Authors:  Morris Moscovitch; R Shayna Rosenbaum; Asaf Gilboa; Donna Rose Addis; Robyn Westmacott; Cheryl Grady; Mary Pat McAndrews; Brian Levine; Sandra Black; Gordon Winocur; Lynn Nadel
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  The long and the short of it: relational memory impairments in amnesia, even at short lags.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Daniel Tranel; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Episodic future thinking.

Authors:  Cristina M. Atance; Daniela K. O'Neill
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Visual imagery deficits, impaired strategic retrieval, or memory loss: disentangling the nature of an amnesic person's autobiographical memory deficit.

Authors:  R Shayna Rosenbaum; Margaret C McKinnon; Brian Levine; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  The medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; Craig E L Stark; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Aging and autobiographical memory: dissociating episodic from semantic retrieval.

Authors:  Brian Levine; Eva Svoboda; Janine F Hay; Gordon Winocur; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-12

10.  The hippocampus is required for short-term topographical memory in humans.

Authors:  Tom Hartley; Chris M Bird; Dennis Chan; Lisa Cipolotti; Masud Husain; Faraneh Vargha-Khadem; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.899

View more
  373 in total

1.  Component processes underlying future thinking.

Authors:  Arnaud D'Argembeau; Claudia Ortoleva; Sabrina Jumentier; Martial Van der Linden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

2.  Evidence for the default network's role in spontaneous cognition.

Authors:  Jessica R Andrews-Hanna; Jay S Reidler; Christine Huang; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Remembering and forecasting: The relation between autobiographical memory and episodic future thinking.

Authors:  Dorthe Berntsen; Annette Bohn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

4.  Evidence for an implicit influence of memory on future thinking.

Authors:  Karl K Szpunar
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

Review 5.  Older and wiser? An affective science perspective on age-related challenges in financial decision making.

Authors:  Mariann R Weierich; Elizabeth A Kensinger; Alicia H Munnell; Steven A Sass; Brad C Dickerson; Christopher I Wright; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Consciousness of subjective time in the brain.

Authors:  Lars Nyberg; Alice S N Kim; Reza Habib; Brian Levine; Endel Tulving
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Age-related effects on the neural correlates of autobiographical memory retrieval.

Authors:  Peggy L St Jacques; David C Rubin; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Getting better without memory.

Authors:  Julia G Halilova; Donna Rose Addis; R Shayna Rosenbaum
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  The default network and the combination of cognitive processes that mediate self-generated thought.

Authors:  Vadim Axelrod; Geraint Rees; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-12-04

Review 10.  The retrosplenial cortical role in encoding behaviorally significant cues.

Authors:  David M Smith; Adam M P Miller; Lindsey C Vedder
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.