Literature DB >> 17229786

The RBE issues in ion-beam therapy: conclusions of a joint IAEA/ICRU working group regarding quantities and units.

A Wambersie1, J H Hendry, P Andreo, P M DeLuca, R Gahbauer, H Menzel, G Whitmore.   

Abstract

This paper summarises the conclusions of a working group established jointly by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) to address some of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) issues encountered in ion-beam therapy. Special emphasis is put on the selection and definition of the involved quantities and units. The isoeffective dose, as introduced here for radiation therapy applications, is the dose that delivered under reference conditions would produce the same clinical effects as the actual treatment in a given system, all other conditions being identical. It is expressed in Gy. The reference treatment conditions are: photon irradiation, 2 Gy per fraction, 5 daily fractions a week. The isoeffective dose D(IsoE) is the product of the physical quantity absorbed dose D and a weighting factor W(IsoE). W(IsoE) is an inclusive weighting factor that takes into account all factors that could influence the clinical effects like dose per fraction, overall time, radiation quality (RQ), biological system and effects. The numerical value of W(IsoE) is selected by the radiation-oncology team for a given patient (or treatment protocol). It is part of the treatment prescription. Evaluation of the influence of RQ on W(IsoE) raises complex problems because of the clinically significant RBE variations with biological effect (late vs. early) and position in depth in the tissues which is a problem specific to ion-beam therapy. Comparison of the isoeffective dose with the equivalent dose frequently used in proton- and ion-beam therapy is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17229786     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncl447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  6 in total

1.  The potential impact of relative biological effectiveness uncertainty on charged particle treatment prescriptions.

Authors:  B Jones; T S A Underwood; R G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Assessing the risk of second malignancies after modern radiotherapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Marco Durante
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Full Monte Carlo-Based Biologic Treatment Plan Optimization System for Intensity Modulated Carbon Ion Therapy on Graphics Processing Unit.

Authors:  Nan Qin; Chenyang Shen; Min-Yu Tsai; Marco Pinto; Zhen Tian; Georgios Dedes; Arnold Pompos; Steve B Jiang; Katia Parodi; Xun Jia
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Relative clinical effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy: theoretical modelling for H&N tumours.

Authors:  Laura Antonovic; Alexandru Dasu; Yoshiya Furusawa; Iuliana Toma-Dasu
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Investigating the impact of alpha/beta and LETd on relative biological effectiveness in scanned proton beams: An in vitro study based on human cell lines.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mara; Monika Clausen; Suphalak Khachonkham; Simon Deycmar; Clara Pessy; Wolfgang Dörr; Peter Kuess; Dietmar Georg; Sylvia Gruber
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Enhanced radiobiological effects at the distal end of a clinical proton beam: in vitro study.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Matsumoto; Taeko Matsuura; Mami Wada; Yusuke Egashira; Teiji Nishio; Yoshiya Furusawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.724

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.