BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is effective in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We investigated whether incorporation of rituximab into the high-dose regimen might further improve the results of ASCT in patients with MCL. DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective phase II study, patients with newly diagnosed MCL were treated with a sequential dose-escalating therapy comprising standard chemotherapy for remission induction, intensive ara-C-containing chemotherapy for mobilization of stem cells, and myeloablative therapy followed by ASCT. The myeloablative regimen consisted of total body irradiation and high-dose cyclophosphamide supplemented with two doses (375 mg/m3) of rituximab. Outcome parameters (toxicity, clinical and molecular response as assessed by allele-specific IGH real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR), event-free survival, and overall survival) were compared with those of 34 historical controls treated identically but without rituximab. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were accrued. Whereas engraftment, toxicity and clinical response were not different from those in controls, event-free survival was significantly increased with rituximab (not reached vs. 43 months; hazard ratio 0.38; p=0.036). This was associated with a trend for a superior molecular response rate in 11 study vs. 10 control patients with a marker available (73% vs. 30%, p=0.086) despite similar levels of lymphoma contamination of the stem cell inocula infused. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of two standard doses of rituximab into the myeloablative regimen might improve outcome of up front ASCT for MCL, allowing long-term disease control to an extent previously not reached in this disease.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is effective in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We investigated whether incorporation of rituximab into the high-dose regimen might further improve the results of ASCT in patients with MCL. DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective phase II study, patients with newly diagnosed MCL were treated with a sequential dose-escalating therapy comprising standard chemotherapy for remission induction, intensive ara-C-containing chemotherapy for mobilization of stem cells, and myeloablative therapy followed by ASCT. The myeloablative regimen consisted of total body irradiation and high-dose cyclophosphamide supplemented with two doses (375 mg/m3) of rituximab. Outcome parameters (toxicity, clinical and molecular response as assessed by allele-specific IGH real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR), event-free survival, and overall survival) were compared with those of 34 historical controls treated identically but without rituximab. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were accrued. Whereas engraftment, toxicity and clinical response were not different from those in controls, event-free survival was significantly increased with rituximab (not reached vs. 43 months; hazard ratio 0.38; p=0.036). This was associated with a trend for a superior molecular response rate in 11 study vs. 10 control patients with a marker available (73% vs. 30%, p=0.086) despite similar levels of lymphoma contamination of the stem cell inocula infused. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of two standard doses of rituximab into the myeloablative regimen might improve outcome of up front ASCT for MCL, allowing long-term disease control to an extent previously not reached in this disease.
Authors: Douglas E Gladstone; Javier Bolaños-Meade; Carol Ann Huff; Marianna Zahurak; Ian Flinn; Ivan Borrello; Leo Luznik; Ephraim Fuchs; Yvette Kasamon; William Matsui; Jonathan Powell; Hyam Levitsky; Robert A Brodsky; Richard Ambinder; Richard J Jones; Lode J Swinnen Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2011-07-14
Authors: Christiane Pott; Eva Hoster; Marie-Helene Delfau-Larue; Kheira Beldjord; Sebastian Böttcher; Vahid Asnafi; Anne Plonquet; Reiner Siebert; Evelyne Callet-Bauchu; Niels Andersen; Jacques J M van Dongen; Wolfram Klapper; Françoise Berger; Vincent Ribrag; Achiel L van Hoof; Marek Trneny; Jan Walewski; Peter Dreger; Michael Unterhalt; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Michael Kneba; Hanneke C Kluin-Nelemans; Olivier Hermine; Elizabeth Macintyre; Martin Dreyling Journal: Blood Date: 2009-12-23 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Rémy Gressin; Sylvie Caulet-Maugendre; Eric Deconinck; Olivier Tournilhac; Emmanuel Gyan; Marie Pierre Moles; Abderrazak El Yamani; Jerome Cornillon; Jean François Rossi; Steven Le Gouill; Gérard Lepeu; Ghandi Damaj; Philippe Solal Celigny; Hervé Maisonneuve; Bernadette Corront; Jean Pierre Vilque; Philippe Casassus; Thierry Lamy; Marc Colonna; Philippe Colombat Journal: Haematologica Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Christian H Geisler; Arne Kolstad; Anna Laurell; Niels S Andersen; Lone B Pedersen; Mats Jerkeman; Mikael Eriksson; Marie Nordström; Eva Kimby; Anne Marie Boesen; Outi Kuittinen; Grete F Lauritzsen; Herman Nilsson-Ehle; Elisabeth Ralfkiaer; Måns Akerman; Mats Ehinger; Christer Sundström; Ruth Langholm; Jan Delabie; Marja-Liisa Karjalainen-Lindsberg; Peter Brown; Erkki Elonen Journal: Blood Date: 2008-07-14 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Constantine S Tam; Roland Bassett; Celina Ledesma; Martin Korbling; Amin Alousi; Chitra Hosing; Partow Kebraei; Robyn Harrell; Gabriela Rondon; Sergio A Giralt; Paolo Anderlini; Uday Popat; Barbara Pro; Barry Samuels; Frederick Hagemeister; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Richard E Champlin; Issa F Khouri Journal: Blood Date: 2009-01-23 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Haige Ye; Aakash Desai; Shengjian Huang; Dayoung Jung; Richard Champlin; Dongfeng Zeng; Fangfang Yan; Krystle Nomie; Jorge Romaguera; Makhdum Ahmed; Michael L Wang Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-07-13