Literature DB >> 17228558

Development of a pictorial scale of pain intensity for patients with communication impairments: initial validation in a general population.

Diana Jackson1, Sandra Horn, Paula Kersten, Lynne Turner-Stokes.   

Abstract

This study evaluated a new six-point ordinal scale for measuring pain intensity. Seventy-two participants aged between 23 and 87 years rated the intensity of 'present pain' as well as remembered episodes of 'severe' and 'mild' pain on the scale of pain intensity (SPIN), a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) and a 0-10 numeric scale, in random order. Retesting followed an intervening assessment. Participants' comments on the scales were analysed thematically. Spearman's correlation between scales all exceeded 0.78 (p<O.O01). Test-retest of the SPIN gave percentage agreements (weighted kappa) of present pain 69% (0.83), severe pain 94% (0.94) and mild pain 83% (0.85). Most participants preferred using an ordinal scale to the continuous VAS. Some found numbers easier to use whereas others found the SPIN more helpful. We conclude that the SPIN provides a valid measure of pain intensity in patients fully able to communicate their views and experiences. Investigation in patients with cognitive or communication impairments is now required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17228558      PMCID: PMC4952770          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.6-6-580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  8 in total

1.  How should we use the visual analogue scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes? II: Visual analogue scales as ratio scales: an alternative to the view of Kersten et al.

Authors:  Donald D Price; Roland Staud; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Paula Kersten; Peter J White; Alan Tennant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  ESCAPS study protocol: a feasibility randomised controlled trial of 'Early electrical stimulation to the wrist extensors and wrist flexors to prevent the post-stroke complications of pain and contractures in the paretic arm'.

Authors:  Joanna C Fletcher-Smith; Dawn-Marie Walker; Nikola Sprigg; Marilyn James; Marion F Walker; Kate Allatt; Rajnikant Mehta; Anand D Pandyan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The Assessment of Pain in Older People: UK National Guidelines.

Authors:  Pat Schofield
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 5.  Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review.

Authors:  Shima Safikhani; Katharine S Gries; Jeremiah J Trudeau; David Reasner; Katja Rüdell; Stephen Joel Coons; Elizabeth Nicole Bush; Jennifer Hanlon; Lucy Abraham; Margaret Vernon
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-09-06

6.  Skeletal muscle-derived cell implantation for the treatment of sphincter-related faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andrea Frudinger; Rainer Marksteiner; Johann Pfeifer; Eva Margreiter; Johannes Paede; Marco Thurner
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 6.832

7.  The pain colour of children with toothache in Turkish population.

Authors:  Halenur Altan; Hüseyin Çevik; Serkan Doğru; Alem Coşgun; Mustafa Süren; İsmail Okan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Impact of integrated upper limb spasticity management including botulinum toxin A on patient-centred goal attainment: rationale and protocol for an international prospective, longitudinal cohort study (ULIS-III).

Authors:  Lynne Turner-Stokes; Stephen Ashford; Jorge Jacinto; Pascal Maisonobe; Jovita Balcaitiene; Klemens Fheodoroff
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.