Literature DB >> 17228251

Stereotactic radiosurgery: adjacent tissue injury and response after high-dose single fraction radiation: Part I--Histology, imaging, and molecular events.

Bryan C Oh1, Paul G Pagnini, Michael Y Wang, Charles Y Liu, Paul E Kim, Cheng Yu, Michael L J Apuzzo.   

Abstract

Radiosurgery is now the preferred treatment modality for many intracranial disease processes. Although almost 50 years have passed since it was introduced as a tool to treat neurological disease, investigations into its effects on normal tissues of the central nervous system are still ongoing. The need for these continuing studies must be underscored. A fundamental understanding of the brain parenchymal response to radiosurgery would permit development of strategies that would enhance and potentiate the radiosurgical treatment effects on diseased tissue while mitigating injury to normal structures. To date, most studies on the response of the central nervous system to radiosurgery have been performed on brain tissue in the absence of pathological lesions, such as benign tumors or metastases. Although instructive, these investigations fail to emulate the majority of clinical scenarios that involve radiosurgical treatment of specific lesions surrounded by normal brain parenchyma. This article is the first in a two-part series that addresses the brain parenchyma's response to radiosurgery. This first article analyzes the histological, radiographic, and molecular data gathered regarding the brain parenchymal response to radiosurgery and aims to suggest future studies that could enhance our understanding of the topic. The second article in the series begins by discussing strategies for radiosurgical therapeutic enhancement. It concludes by focusing on strategies for mitigation and repair of radiation-induced brain injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17228251     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249191.23162.D2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  11 in total

Review 1.  Radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastases: critical review regarding complications.

Authors:  Marcos Vinícius Calfat Maldaun; Paulo Henrique Pires Aguiar; Frederick Lang; Dima Suki; David Wildrick; Raymond Sawaya
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme from radiation necrosis after external beam radiation therapy with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging.

Authors:  Ramon F Barajas; Jamie S Chang; Mark R Segal; Andrew T Parsa; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Soonmee Cha
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Radiologic and histologic consequences of radiosurgery for brain tumors.

Authors:  Ahmed Alomari; Philipp J Rauch; Maria Orsaria; Frank J Minja; Veronica L Chiang; Alexander O Vortmeyer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  A comprehensive review of MR imaging changes following radiosurgery to 500 brain metastases.

Authors:  T R Patel; B J McHugh; W L Bi; F J Minja; J P S Knisely; V L Chiang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Diffusion and perfusion MRI to differentiate treatment-related changes including pseudoprogression from recurrent tumors in high-grade gliomas with histopathologic evidence.

Authors:  A J Prager; N Martinez; K Beal; A Omuro; Z Zhang; R J Young
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Analysis of the layering pattern of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiation of radiation necrosis from tumour progression.

Authors:  Jihoon Cha; Sung Tae Kim; Hyung-Jin Kim; Hye Jeong Kim; Byung-Joon Kim; Pyoung Jeon; Keon Ha Kim; Hong Sik Byun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Drug and gene delivery across the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Kelsie F Timbie; Brian P Mead; Richard J Price
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Comparison between the Prebolus T1 Measurement and the Fixed T1 Value in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging for the Differentiation of True Progression from Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma Treated with Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide Chemotherapy.

Authors:  J G Nam; K M Kang; S H Choi; W H Lim; R-E Yoo; J-H Kim; T J Yun; C-H Sohn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked clinical questions.

Authors:  Marco Essig; Thanh Binh Nguyen; Mark S Shiroishi; Marc Saake; James M Provenzale; David S Enterline; Nicoletta Anzalone; Arnd Dörfler; Àlex Rovira; Max Wintermark; Meng Law
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  True progression versus pseudoprogression in the treatment of glioblastomas: a comparison study of normalized cerebral blood volume and apparent diffusion coefficient by histogram analysis.

Authors:  Yong Sub Song; Seung Hong Choi; Chul-Kee Park; Kyung Sik Yi; Woong Jae Lee; Tae Jin Yun; Tae Min Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Ji-Hoon Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn; Sung-Hye Park; Il Han Kim; Geon-Ho Jahng; Kee-Hyun Chang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.