Literature DB >> 17228175

Functional magnetic resonance imaging is more reliable than somatosensory evoked potential or mapping for the detection of the primary motor cortex in proximity to a tumor.

N Shinoura1, R Yamada, Y Suzuki, T Kodama, K Sekiguchi, M Takahashi, K Yagi.   

Abstract

The accurate localization of the primary motor cortex (M1) is critical for the preservation of motor function during resection of brain tumors in and around the M1. The goal of the present study was to determine which technique provided the most accurate localization of M1. The accuracy of preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) and cortical mapping for the localization of M1 was determined in 17 patients with brain tumors in and around the M1. Because localization of the M1 is typically symmetrical in the cerebral hemispheres, the M1 on the affected side was localized by determination of the M1 location on the unaffected side using fMRI with patient hand clenching. The location of M1 was successfully determined by SEP in 5 of 11 cases. In the remainder of cases, the sulcus at which phase reversal occurred during SEP was shifted 1 or 2 gyri rostral to the central sulcus. The location of M1 was successfully determined by brain mapping in 9 of 15 cases. In the remainder of cases, stimulation failed to elicit a motor response. Finally, the location of M1 was successfully determined by fMRI in 16 of 17 cases. These data indicate that fMRI was more reliable than SEP or brain mapping for the detection of M1 in proximity to a tumor. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17228175     DOI: 10.1159/000098524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg        ISSN: 1011-6125            Impact factor:   1.875


  6 in total

1.  Intraoperative DTI and brain mapping for surgery of neoplasm of the motor cortex and the corticospinal tract: our protocol and series in BrainSUITE.

Authors:  Giancarlo D'Andrea; Albina Angelini; Andrea Romano; Antonio Di Lauro; Giovanni Sessa; Alessandro Bozzao; Luigi Ferrante
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Clinical applications of imaging biomarkers. Part 2. The neurosurgeon's perspective.

Authors:  A Brodbelt
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Utilization of functional MRI language paradigms for pre-operative mapping: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hanani Abdul Manan; Elizabeth A Franz; Noorazrul Yahya
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Emerging clinical imaging techniques for cerebral cavernous malformations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter G Campbell; Pascal Jabbour; Sanjay Yadla; Issam A Awad
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Cortical mapping and frameless stereotactic navigation in the high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging suite.

Authors:  David M Weingarten; Ashok R Asthagiri; John A Butman; Susumu Sato; Edythe A Wiggs; Bonita Damaska; John D Heiss
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Clinical applications and future directions of functional MRI.

Authors:  Daniel A Orringer; David R Vago; Alexandra J Golby
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.420

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.