Literature DB >> 17227563

Selective use of older adults in right lobe living donor liver transplantation.

S A Shah1, M S Cattral, I D McGilvray, L D Adcock, G Gallagher, R Smith, L B Lilly, N Girgrah, P D Greig, G A Levy, D R Grant.   

Abstract

Many centers are reluctant to use older donors (>44 years) for adult right-lobe living donor liver transplantation (RLDLT) due to concerns about possible increased morbidity in donors and poorer outcomes in recipients. Since 2000, 130 adult RLDLTs have been performed at our institution. Recipients were divided into those who received a right lobe graft from a donor </=age 44 (n = 89, 68%; median age 30) and those who received a liver graft from a donor age >44 (n = 41, 32%; mean age 52). The two donor and recipient populations had similar demographic and operative profiles. With a median follow-up of 29 months, the severity and number of complications in older donors were similar to those in younger donors. No living donor died. Older donor allografts had initial allograft dysfunction compared to younger donors. Complication rates were similar among recipients in both groups but there was a higher bile duct stricture rate with older donor grafts (27% vs. 12%; p = 0.04). One-year recipient graft survival was 86% for older donors and 85% for younger donors (p = 0.95). Early experience with the use of selected older adults (>44 years) for RLDLT is encouraging, but may be associated with a higher rate of biliary complications in the recipient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17227563     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01596.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  9 in total

1.  Ratio of remnant to total liver volume or remnant to body weight: which one is more predictive on donor outcomes?

Authors:  Onur Yaprak; Necdet Guler; Gulum Altaca; Murat Dayangac; Tolga Demirbas; Murat Akyildiz; Levent Ulusoy; Yaman Tokat; Yildiray Yuzer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Liver regeneration after living donor transplantation: adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study.

Authors:  Kim M Olthoff; Jean C Emond; Tempie H Shearon; Greg Everson; Talia B Baker; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; Brenda W Gillespie; James E Everhart
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Transplantation: Minimizing the risks for living donors of right lobe liver grafts.

Authors:  Hiroto Egawa
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  Pushing the frontiers of living donor right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Seong Hoon Kim; Seung Duk Lee; Young Kyu Kim; Sang-Jae Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Adult to adult living related liver transplantation: where do we currently stand?

Authors:  Erica M Carlisle; Giuliano Testa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Donor age affects liver regeneration during early period in the graft liver and late period in the remnant liver after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Akihiro Tanemura; Shugo Mizuno; Hideo Wada; Tomomi Yamada; Tsutomu Nobori; Shuji Isaji
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Live liver donors' risk thresholds: risking a life to save a life.

Authors:  Michele Molinari; Jacob Matz; Sarah DeCoutere; Karim El-Tawil; Bassam Abu-Wasel; Valerie Keough
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Complications of right lobe living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  James W Marsh; Edward Gray; Roberta Ness; Thomas E Starzl
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Live donor liver transplantation: current status.

Authors:  Sonja K Olsen; Robert S Brown
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2008-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.