CONTEXT: It has recently been shown by cytogenetics that there is a high incidence of chromosome 1 abnormalities in renal oncocytomas. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the cytogenetic results by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. DESIGN: Nine additional cytogenetic analyses were added to those reported in our recent study, with a total of 27 tumors studied, which makes it the largest series of renal oncocytomas studied to date by cytogenetics and/or FISH. We used the LSI 1p36/LSI 1q25 Dual Color Probe Set to make the analyses. RESULTS: In this study, combined cytogenetics and FISH showed loss of chromosome arm 1p1 in 48% of renal oncocytomas. By FISH, deletion of 1p36.3 was observed in 59% of renal oncocytomas, whereas by cytogenetics, abnormality in chromosome 1 was seen in 32% of tumors. However, the incidence of chromosome 1 abnormalities among 9 bilateral tumors was much higher than in single tumors (88% vs 28%, respectively). Loss of only the 1p36.3 site occurred in 2 renal oncocytomas with translocation of chromosome 1, as shown by cytogenetics. Concordance between the 2 techniques, when they were used simultaneously to detect chromosome 1p1 abnormality, was 82%. CONCLUSIONS: This study further confirmed our prior results demonstrating the widespread occurrence of chromosome 1 abnormalities in renal oncocytomas. Although no abnormalities in chromosome 1 in tumors with normal karyotypes were detected by FISH using the current set of probes, a much higher incidence of such abnormalities was found in bilateral tumors, suggesting that genetic alterations related to the development of renal oncocytoma reside in this region.
CONTEXT: It has recently been shown by cytogenetics that there is a high incidence of chromosome 1 abnormalities in renal oncocytomas. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the cytogenetic results by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. DESIGN: Nine additional cytogenetic analyses were added to those reported in our recent study, with a total of 27 tumors studied, which makes it the largest series of renal oncocytomas studied to date by cytogenetics and/or FISH. We used the LSI 1p36/LSI 1q25 Dual Color Probe Set to make the analyses. RESULTS: In this study, combined cytogenetics and FISH showed loss of chromosome arm 1p1 in 48% of renal oncocytomas. By FISH, deletion of 1p36.3 was observed in 59% of renal oncocytomas, whereas by cytogenetics, abnormality in chromosome 1 was seen in 32% of tumors. However, the incidence of chromosome 1 abnormalities among 9 bilateral tumors was much higher than in single tumors (88% vs 28%, respectively). Loss of only the 1p36.3 site occurred in 2 renal oncocytomas with translocation of chromosome 1, as shown by cytogenetics. Concordance between the 2 techniques, when they were used simultaneously to detect chromosome 1p1 abnormality, was 82%. CONCLUSIONS: This study further confirmed our prior results demonstrating the widespread occurrence of chromosome 1 abnormalities in renal oncocytomas. Although no abnormalities in chromosome 1 in tumors with normal karyotypes were detected by FISH using the current set of probes, a much higher incidence of such abnormalities was found in bilateral tumors, suggesting that genetic alterations related to the development of renal oncocytoma reside in this region.
Authors: Marie Dvorakova; Rajiv Dhir; Sheldon I Bastacky; Kathleen M Cieply; Marie B Acquafondata; Carol R Sherer; Tracy L Mercuri; Anil V Parwani Journal: Diagn Pathol Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 2.644
Authors: Jeff A Klomp; David Petillo; Natalie M Niemi; Karl J Dykema; Jindong Chen; Ximing J Yang; Annika Sääf; Peter Zickert; Markus Aly; Ulf Bergerheim; Magnus Nordenskjöld; Sophie Gad; Sophie Giraud; Yves Denoux; Laurent Yonneau; Arnaud Méjean; Viorel Vasiliu; Stéphane Richard; Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Bin T Teh; Kyle A Furge Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Jill M Hagenkord; Anil V Parwani; Maureen A Lyons-Weiler; Karla Alvarez; Robert Amato; Zoran Gatalica; Jose M Gonzalez-Berjon; Leif Peterson; Rajiv Dhir; Federico A Monzon Journal: Diagn Pathol Date: 2008-11-06 Impact factor: 2.644