Literature DB >> 17225128

Discussion point: should governments buy drug patents?

Juan del Llano1.   

Abstract

Between just 1995 and 2003, the number of new chemical entities fell from 45 to 25, while the costs increased by two and a half times in the same period. Firms in the USA accounted for more than half of biotech drugs from 1982 to 2003. European firms are losing competitiveness. In this hostile environment for investment in pharmaceutical R&D, providing quick access to market for real innovations is the main challenge for regulatory agencies. More initiatives, more entrepreneurial spirit and easier work regulation are needed to facilitate the growth of firms in this field, especially in emerging economies like the Spanish. A new open source model proposes the use of pre-competitive public platforms formed by young and qualified human capital carrying out research in areas not sufficiently attractive for private initiatives, followed by the introduction of pharmaceutical companies to carry out the clinical research. The last step would be fast and effective approval by assessment agencies. Governments should, therefore, facilitate the regulation of socially effective innovations, bringing in manufacturers to take part in the post-clinical trial period after entering the market. The gathering of incentives between regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical industry must be approached through innovation and authorization stimulating systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17225128     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-006-0018-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  6 in total

1.  Gaps in the evaluation and monitoring of new pharmaceuticals: proposal for a different approach.

Authors:  Andreas Laupacis; J Michael Paterson; Muhammad Mamdani; Alaa Rostom; Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-11-25       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Postmarketing surveillance--lack of vigilance, lack of trust.

Authors:  Phil B Fontanarosa; Drummond Rennie; Catherine D DeAngelis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  COX-2 inhibitors--lessons in drug safety.

Authors:  Bruce M Psaty; Curt D Furberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Reform of drug regulation--beyond an independent drug-safety board.

Authors:  Wayne A Ray; C Michael Stein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The quantity and quality of worldwide new drug introductions, 1982-2003.

Authors:  Henry G Grabowski; Y Richard Wang
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Making medicines safer--the need for an independent drug safety board.

Authors:  A J Wood; C M Stein; R Woosley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-17       Impact factor: 91.245

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Public health policies for the common interest: rethinking EU states' incentives strategies when a pandemic reshuffles all interests.

Authors:  Juan Del Llano; Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz; Jaime Espin; Jordi Gol-Montserrat; Alicia Del Llano; Carlos Bringas
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-07-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.