Literature DB >> 17224674

Modern scleral lenses part I: clinical features.

Esther-Simone Visser1, Rients Visser, Henk J J van Lier, Henny M Otten.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the indications for modern scleral lenses and their clinical performance in patients who were fitted with scleral lenses at the authors' practices.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey, all the necessary data were obtained at the first follow-up visit during the 5-month study period. There were four types of scleral lenses: spherical, front-surface toric, back-surface toric, and bitoric. The preformed scleral lens fitting technique developed at Visser Contact Lens Practice was used in all patients. The lenses were cut by precise Sub Micron Lathing from a Boston Equalens II blank at Procornea. Visual acuity and slitlamp findings were recorded. A specially designed classification for scleral lens fitting was used to investigate clinical performance.
RESULTS: The largest proportion of the 178 patients (284 eyes) were diagnosed with keratoconus (143 [50.4%] eyes) followed by postpenetrating keratoplasty (56 [19.7%] eyes). The remaining diagnoses were irregular astigmatism, keratitis sicca, corneal dystrophy, and multiple diagnoses. The ratio of spherical to back-surface toric designs was 1:1.1. Clinical examination showed sharp increases in visual acuity (median increase, 0.45) and safe physiologic responses of the anterior eye. All the patients could continue to wear scleral lenses, with 79.2% with the same lens parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Several types of corneal abnormality were managed successfully with modern scleral lenses. The main indication was optical correction of an irregular corneal surface. Satisfactory clinical performance meant that all the patients could continue to wear their scleral lenses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17224674     DOI: 10.1097/01.icl.0000233217.68379.d5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye Contact Lens        ISSN: 1542-2321            Impact factor:   2.018


  7 in total

1.  Visual performance with changes in eccentricity in PROSE device: a case report.

Authors:  Divya Jagadeesh; Rajeswari Mahadevan
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2013-05-14

2.  Scleral lens prescription and management practices: Emerging consensus.

Authors:  Muriel M Schornack; Jennifer Fogt; Amy Nau; Cherie B Nau; Jennifer S Harthan; Dingcai Cao; Ellen Shorter
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 3.  Nonsurgical Procedures for Keratoconus Management.

Authors:  L Rico-Del-Viejo; M Garcia-Montero; J L Hernández-Verdejo; S García-Lázaro; F J Gómez-Sanz; A Lorente-Velázquez
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 4.  Therapeutic uses of scleral contact lenses for ocular surface disease: patient selection and special considerations.

Authors:  Jennifer S Harthan; Ellen Shorter
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2018-07-11

Review 5.  How Can We Best Measure the Performance of Scleral Lenses? Current Insights.

Authors:  Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo; Daddi Fadel; Melissa Barnett
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2022-04-07

6.  Effectiveness of More than 2-Year Treatment with Miniscleral Contact Lens in Ocular Surface Diseases: Four Case Reports.

Authors:  Min Sung Oh; Min Seung Kang; Su Hwan Park; Ji Eun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-05

7.  Rose-K versus Soper contact lens in keratoconus: a randomized comparative trial.

Authors:  Raghav Gupta; Rajesh Sinha; Pooja Singh; Namrata Sharma; Radhika Tandon; Jeewan S Titiyal
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.