June K Robinson1, Rob Turrisi, Jerod Stapleton. 1. Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. wtbjkr@rcn.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of partner assistance in learning and implementation of an intervention designed to promote skin self-examination (SSE) behaviors in persons at risk of developing melanoma. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with immediate and 4-month follow-up visits. SETTING:Clinical offices in the ambulatory care area of a hospital. Patients The study included 130 participants and their cohabiting partners drawn from a melanoma registry. Intervention The subjects were randomly assigned to receive the intervention either as solo learning or as dyadic learning. The intervention consisted of a 10-minute demonstration of the ABCDE (asymmetry of shape, border irregularity, color variegation, diameter > or =6 mm, and evolution of the lesion) rule and skills training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Behavioral measures included self-reported performance of SSE and use of a body map designed to record areas of concern found during SSE. Intentions, along with attitudinal measures such as perceived importance of SSE and self-efficacy in performing SSE, were also assessed at the 4-month follow-up visit. RESULTS: The participants in the dyadic learning group were significantly more likely to report engaging in SSE behaviors (P<.05). The dyadic learning group also exhibited greater intentions to perform future SSE (P<.01), higher perceived importance of SSE (P<.01), and higher perceived self-efficacy (P<.01). CONCLUSION:Dyadic learning may be more effective than solo learning in regard to interventions designed to teach and promote health behaviors, such as SSE.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of partner assistance in learning and implementation of an intervention designed to promote skin self-examination (SSE) behaviors in persons at risk of developing melanoma. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with immediate and 4-month follow-up visits. SETTING: Clinical offices in the ambulatory care area of a hospital. Patients The study included 130 participants and their cohabiting partners drawn from a melanoma registry. Intervention The subjects were randomly assigned to receive the intervention either as solo learning or as dyadic learning. The intervention consisted of a 10-minute demonstration of the ABCDE (asymmetry of shape, border irregularity, color variegation, diameter > or =6 mm, and evolution of the lesion) rule and skills training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Behavioral measures included self-reported performance of SSE and use of a body map designed to record areas of concern found during SSE. Intentions, along with attitudinal measures such as perceived importance of SSE and self-efficacy in performing SSE, were also assessed at the 4-month follow-up visit. RESULTS: The participants in the dyadic learning group were significantly more likely to report engaging in SSE behaviors (P<.05). The dyadic learning group also exhibited greater intentions to perform future SSE (P<.01), higher perceived importance of SSE (P<.01), and higher perceived self-efficacy (P<.01). CONCLUSION: Dyadic learning may be more effective than solo learning in regard to interventions designed to teach and promote health behaviors, such as SSE.
Authors: J K Robinson; Y Guevara; R Gaber; M L Clayman; M J Kwasny; J J Friedewald; E J Gordon Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Vinayak K Nahar; M Allison Ford; Robert T Brodell; Javier F Boyas; Stephanie K Jacks; Rizwana Biviji-Sharma; Mary A Haskins; Martha A Bass Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Jerod L Stapleton; Rob Turrisi; Kimberly A Mallett; June K Robinson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Alan C Geller; Barbra A Dickerman; Jennifer M Taber; Laura A Dwyer; Anne M Hartman; Frank M Perna Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: June K Robinson; Jerod Stapleton; Rob Turrisi; Kimberly A Mallett; Mary Martini Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 11.527