Literature DB >> 17224421

Left ventricular electromechanical delay in patients with heart failure and normal QRS duration and in patients with right and left bundle branch block.

Luigi P Badano1, Oscar Gaddi, Carlo Peraldo, Gabriele Lupi, Marta Sitges, Frangisko Parthenakis, Santo Molteni, Maria Rosaria Pagliuca, Biagio Sassone, Paola Di Stefano, Tiziana De Santo, Carlo Menozzi, Michele Brignole.   

Abstract

AIMS: We sought to define the reference values of intra-left ventricular (LV) electromechanical delay (EMD), and to assess the prevalence (and pattern) of intra-LV dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure (HF) and normal QRS and in patients with right and left bundle branch block. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We used tissue Doppler imaging echocardiography and a six-LV wall model to study LV EMD in 103 patients [41 with HF and normal QRS, 22 with right bundle branch block (RBBB), and 40 with left bundle branch block (LBBB)], and in 59 controls. In controls, the median intra-LV EMD was 17 ms, (inter-quartile range 13-30); 95% of controls had a value < or =41 ms. Patients showed a longer intra-LV EMD than controls: 33 ms (20-57) in patients with normal QRS, 32 ms (23-50) in RBBB patients, and 50 ms (30-94) in LBBB patients. Intra-LV dyssynchrony (defined as intra-LV EMD >41 ms) was present in 39, 36, and 60% of the patients, respectively. On average, HF patients showed the same pattern of activation as controls, from the septum to the posterior wall, but activation times were significantly prolonged. In RBBB patients the activation sequence was directed from inferior to anterior and in LBBB from anterior to inferior wall.
CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular dyssynchrony was present in several patients with HF and normal QRS, and in patients with RBBB; conversely, 40% of LBBB patients showed values of LV EMD within the normal range. Left ventricular activation sequence was different between groups. Assessment of LV synchronicity by means of imaging techniques may be more important than QRS duration or morphology in selecting patients for cardiac resynchronization treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17224421     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eul144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  8 in total

1.  Prolonged electromechanical delay as an early predictor of trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeong Cheon Choe; Jung Hyun Choi; Jong Hyun Choi; Jinhee Ahn; Jin Sup Park; Hye Won Lee; Jun-Hyok Oh; Han Cheol Lee; Kwang Soo Cha; Taek Jong Hong
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Ventricular dyssynchrony patterns in left bundle branch block, with and without heart failure.

Authors:  Hygriv B Rao; Raghu Krishnaswami; Sharada Kalavakolanu; Narasimhan Calambur
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-03-05

3.  Correlation of mechanical dyssynchrony with QRS duration measured by signal-averaged electrocardiography.

Authors:  George K Andrikopoulos; Stylianos Tzeis; Christof Kolb; Dimitrios Sakellariou; Dimosthenes Avramides; Evangelos C Alexopoulos; Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Antonis S Manolis
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Use of proposed systolic and myocardial performance indices derived from simultaneous ECG and PCG recordings to assess cardiac function in healthy Beagles.

Authors:  Karlo Romano B Gicana; Chirutchaya Pinidmontree; Kitchanan Kosalathip; Siraphop Sirirut; Siripen Komolvanich; Sariya Asawakarn; Walasinee Sakcamduang; Phornphop Naiyanetr; Kittipong Tachampa
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-07-25

5.  Left bundle branch potential predicts better electrical synchrony in bradycardia patients receiving left bundle branch pacing.

Authors:  Jingjuan Huang; Lina Guo; Weiwei Zhang; Ruogu Li; Ben He
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.174

6.  Ventricular dyssynchrony: 12-month evaluation in ischemic versus nonischemic CRT patients.

Authors:  Carlo Peraldo; Paolo Azzolini; Sabrina Matera; Donatella Nistri; Stefano Bianchi; Fabrizio Sgreccia; Sergio Valsecchi; Mario Davinelli; Andrea Puglisi
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2009-01-07

7.  Comparison of Echocardiographic Markers of Cardiac Dyssynchrony and Latest Left Ventricular Activation Site in Heart Failure Patients with and without Left Bundle Branch Block.

Authors:  Masoumeh Lotfi-Tokaldany; Zahra Savand Roomi; Ali Kasemisaeid; Hakimeh Sadeghian
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2013-04-28

8.  Comparison of Different Methods for Estimating Cardiac Timings: A Comprehensive Multimodal Echocardiography Investigation.

Authors:  Parastoo Dehkordi; Farzad Khosrow-Khavar; Marco Di Rienzo; Omer T Inan; Samuel E Schmidt; Andrew P Blaber; Kasper Sørensen; Johannes J Struijk; Vahid Zakeri; Prospero Lombardi; Md Mobashir H Shandhi; Mojtaba Borairi; John M Zanetti; Kouhyar Tavakolian
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.