Literature DB >> 17223789

Affinity chromatography of GroEL chaperonin based on denatured proteins: role of electrostatic interactions in regulation of GroEL affinity for protein substrates.

N Iu Marchenko1, V V Marchenkov, A L Kaĭsheva, I A Kashparov, N V Kotova, P A Kaliman, G V Semisotnov.   

Abstract

The chaperonin GroEL of the heat shock protein family from Escherichia coli cells can bind various polypeptides lacking rigid tertiary structure and thus prevent their nonspecific association and provide for acquisition of native conformation. In the present work we studied the interaction of GroEL with six denatured proteins (alpha-lactalbumin, ribonuclease A, egg lysozyme in the presence of dithiothreitol, pepsin, beta-casein, and apocytochrome c) possessing negative or positive total charge at neutral pH values and different in hydrophobicity (affinity for a hydrophobic probe ANS). To prevent the influence of nonspecific association of non-native proteins on their interaction with GroEL and make easier the recording of the complexing, the proteins were covalently attached to BrCN-activated Sepharose. At low ionic strength (lower than 60 mM), tight binding of the negatively charged denatured proteins with GroEL (which is also negatively charged) needed relatively low concentrations (approximately 10 mM) of bivalent cations Mg2+ or Ca2+. At the high ionic strength (approximately 600 mM), a tight complex was produced also in the absence of bivalent cations. In contrast, positively charged denatured proteins tightly interacted with GroEL irrespectively of the presence of bivalent cations and ionic strength of the solution (from 20 to 600 mM). These features of GroEL interaction with positively and negatively charged denatured proteins were confirmed by polarized fluorescence (fluorescence anisotropy). The findings suggest that the affinity of GroEL for denatured proteins can be determined by the balance of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17223789     DOI: 10.1134/s000629790612011x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry (Mosc)        ISSN: 0006-2979            Impact factor:   2.487


  4 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of the effects of alpha-crystallin and GroEL on the kinetics of thermal aggregation of rabbit muscle glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Kira A Markossian; Nikolay V Golub; Natalia A Chebotareva; Regina A Asryants; Irina N Naletova; Vladimir I Muronetz; Konstantin O Muranov; Boris I Kurganov
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Adsorption characteristics of an enteric virus-binding protein to norovirus, rotavirus and poliovirus.

Authors:  Takahiro Imai; Daisuke Sano; Takayuki Miura; Satoshi Okabe; Keishi Wada; Yoshifumi Masago; Tatsuo Omura
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 2.563

Review 3.  GroEL-assisted protein folding: does it occur within the chaperonin inner cavity?

Authors:  Victor V Marchenkov; Gennady V Semisotnov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Dataset concerning GroEL chaperonin interaction with proteins.

Authors:  V V Marchenkov; N Yu Marchenko; A L Kaysheva; N V Kotova; I A Kashparov; G V Semisotnov
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2016-01-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.