Literature DB >> 17223561

Predicting the outcome of shunt surgery in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

K Kilic1, A Czorny, J Auque, Z Berkman.   

Abstract

We studied retrospectively the effectiveness of the repeated lumbar CSF tap test (RTT), lumbar external CSF drainage (LED) and radioisotope cisternography (RIC) in predicting the outcome of shunt surgery, as well as the diagnostic and prognostic value of periventricular hyperintensity (PVH) and of the classic clinical triad in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Two hundred and seventy patients were referred to the Departments of Neurosurgery, in Nancy, France and in Istanbul, Turkey. The decision to perform surgery was based on the clinical presentation (all patients had at least two symptoms of the classic clinical triad), neuroimaging examinations and the results of the RTT (taps were performed on three consecutive days and at each tap a minimum of 30 to 40 cc of CSF was removed), the LED (drainage was performed for 3 days and the volume of CSF drained daily was a minimum of 150 to 250 cc) or the RIC. After all shunt procedures, postoperative assessments verified improvements in 88% of the RTT group, 91% of the LED group and 66% of the RIC group. Gait disturbance had improved in 90% at the end of the second and twelfth month follow-up. Cognitive dysfunction had improved in 79% at the second and in 77% at the twelfth month follow-up. Urinary incontinence had improved in 66% at the second and in 62% at the twelfth month follow-up. From the surgical point of view, the greatest difficulty is not to make the diagnosis, but rather to identify the appropriate patients to operate on. The decision to perform shunt surgery should be based on strict clinical findings associated with CT and MRI criteria and especially with positive RTT or LED test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17223561     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  6 in total

Review 1.  Practice guideline: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Response to shunting and predictors of response: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  John J Halperin; Roger Kurlan; Jason M Schwalb; Michael D Cusimano; Gary Gronseth; David Gloss
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Diurnally fluctuating frontal dysequilibrium secondary to a pineal pilocytic astrocytoma: is this symptom associated with a check-valve mechanism in a pineal region tumor?

Authors:  Tae-Won Kim; Tae-Kyu Lee; Bum-Soo Kim; Kwang-Soo Lee; In-Uk Song; Joong-Seok Kim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  External lumbar drain: A pragmatic test for prediction of shunt outcomes in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Silky Chotai; Ricky Medel; Nabeel A Herial; Azedine Medhkour
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-01-27

4.  Predicting the outcome of normal pressure hydrocephalus therapy-where do we stand?

Authors:  Joachim M K Oertel; Matthias J M Huelser
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) as a Cognitive Evaluation Tool for Patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Daisuke Nakatsu; Toru Fukuhara; Naomi S Chaytor; Vaishali S Phatak; Anthony M Avellino
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 6.  Normal pressure hydrocephalus: Diagnostic and predictive evaluationon.

Authors:  Benito Pereira Damasceno
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.