Literature DB >> 17223511

Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.

Steven Sheng-Tsung Lai1, Yu-Chuan Tseng, I-Yueh Huang, Yi-Hsin Yang, Yee-Shyong Shen, Chun-Ming Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery is widely used to correct congenital and acquired dentofacial discrepancies. Various surgical procedures have been advocated for correction of mandibular prognathism. In this study, a modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy has been developed for surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. The aim of this study is to identify contributing factors to skeletal change by analysing cephalometric changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
METHODS: Forty-one patients, treated for absolute mandibular prognathism by bilateral modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy, were evaluated cephalometrically with reference to the menton point. A set of four standardised lateral cephalograms were obtained from each subject preoperatively (T1) and immediately postoperatively (T2), prior to removal of maxillomandibular fixation (T3), and at 1-year postoperatively (T4). The mean setback of the menton was 12.4 mm in the horizontal direction. Relapse was defined as forward movement of the menton during the 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS: The highly significant backward movements in a horizontal direction were observed during the maxillomandibular fixation period (T3-T2). Moreover, highly significant forward movement was observed following the maxillomandibular fixation period (T4-T3). After 1-year follow-up (T4-T2), the mean changes of the menton were 0.1 mm backward in the horizontal direction.
CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the mean skeletal change compared with the amount of setback was less than 1% (0.1/12.4 mm) in backward movement. The results suggest that the modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy technique is useful and the more stable approach for correction of severe mandibular prognathism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17223511     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

Review 1.  Orthognathic surgery and temporomandibular joint symptoms.

Authors:  Hwi-Dong Jung; Sang Yoon Kim; Hyung-Sik Park; Young-Soo Jung
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-05-28

2.  Relationship between Frontal Gap and Postoperative Stability in the Treatment of Mandibular Prognathism.

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Tseng; Kun-Jung Hsu; Ker-Kong Chen; Ju-Hui Wu; Chun-Ming Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Are Hyoid Bone and Tongue the Risk Factors Contributing to Postoperative Relapse for Mandibular Prognathism?

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Tseng; Steven Lai; Huey-Er Lee; Ker-Kong Chen; Chun-Ming Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  The Effect of Pterygomasseteric Sling's Area in the Postoperative Stability after Mandibular Setback Surgery.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Chen; Chun-Chan Ting; Jung-Hsuan Cheng; Kun-Jung Hsu; Yu-Chuan Tseng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Chen; Yu-Chuan Tseng; Edward Chengchuan Ko; Michael Yuan-Chien Chen; Kwei-Jing Chen; Jung-Hsuan Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.